ReviewDie Ophthalmologie2024
[Use of artificial intelligence for recognition of biomarkers in intermediate age-related macular degeneration].
Review in Die Ophthalmologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advances in imaging and artificial intelligence (AI) have revolutionized the detection, quantification and monitoring for the clinical assessment of intermediate age-related macular degeneration (iAMD). The iAMD incorporates a broad spectrum of manifestations, which range from individual small drusen, hyperpigmentation, hypopigmentation up to early stages of geographical atrophy. Current high-resolution imaging technologies enable an accurate detection and description of anatomical features, such as drusen volumes, hyperreflexive foci and photoreceptor degeneration, which are risk factors that are decisive for prediction of the course of the disease; however, the manual annotation of these features in complex optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans is impractical for the routine clinical practice and research. In this context AI provides a solution by fully automatic segmentation and therefore delivers exact, reproducible and quantitative analyses of AMD-related biomarkers. Furthermore, the application of AI in iAMD facilitates the risk assessment and the development of structural endpoints for new forms of treatment. For example, the quantitative analysis of drusen volume and hyperreflective foci with AI algorithms has shown a correlation with the progression of the disease. These technological advances therefore improve not only the diagnostic precision but also support future targeted treatment strategies and contribute to the prioritized target of personalized medicine in the diagnostics and treatment of AMD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39083095What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.