ReviewDie Ophthalmologie2024
[Use of artificial intelligence in geographic atrophy in age-related macular degeneration].
Review in Die Ophthalmologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Progression assessment for geographic atrophy].Die Ophthalmologie · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The first regulatory approval of treatment for geographic atrophy (GA) secondary to age-related macular degeneration in the USA constitutes an important milestone; however, due to the nature of GA as a non-acute, insidiously progressing pathology, the ophthalmologist faces specific challenges concerning risk stratification, making treatment decisions, monitoring of treatment and patient education. Innovative retinal imaging modalities, such as fundus autofluorescence (FAF) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) have enabled identification of typical morphological alterations in relation to GA, which are also suitable for the quantitative characterization of GA. Solutions based on artificial intelligence (AI) enable automated detection and quantification of GA-specific biomarkers on retinal imaging data, also retrospectively and over time. Moreover, AI solutions can be used for the diagnosis and segmentation of GA as well as the prediction of structure and function without and under GA treatment, thereby making a valuable contribution to treatment monitoring and the identification of high-risk patients and patient education. The integration of AI solutions into existing clinical processes and software systems enables the broad implementation of informed and personalized treatment of GA secondary to AMD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39083094What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.