ArticleCancer medicine2024
Exploring the symptoms and psychological experiences among lung cancer convalescence patients after radical lobectomy: A qualitative study.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Postoperative symptom trajectories in early-stage lung cancer: a latent transition analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- A Qualitative Study on the Psychological Experience of Lung Cancer Patients During the Perioperative Period.Cancer management and research · 2026Article
- Postoperative outcomes in pulmonary nodule patients: a comparative analysis of aggressiveJournal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Healthcare workers' real experiences with lung cancer: a qualitative study in China.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
- Self-efficacy-kinesiophobia correlation in postoperative patients with primary liver cancer: the chain-mediating effect of postoperative fatigue and negative emotions.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Exploring the symptoms and psychological experiences among lung cancer convalescence patients after radical lobectomy: A qualitative study.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to explore the symptom experiences and psychological feelings of lung cancer patients after radical lobectomy in China.
methodsA qualitative study was conducted using face-to-face semistructured interviews with lung cancer patients who had a radical lobectomy for treatment of their cancer during the convalescence period. Participants (n = 18) were recruited from a general hospital in China, and patients were selected using purposive sampling from September 2021 to February 2022. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim, and Colaizzi's seven-step method of phenomenology was used. The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist was conducted to report the study.
resultsFour themes were extracted from the interview data: physiological dimensions (fatigue, cough or sputum, chest tightness and shortness of breath, daily activities affected, sleep disturbance, lack of appetite); psychological dimensions (negative emotion, fear of cancer recurrence, learning to accept reality, strengthened faith and hope); family dimensions (heavy economic burden, perceived family care, improved health management behavior); and social dimensions (perceived support of medical staff, decreased sense of social value and self-identity, changes in social and working style).
conclusionLung cancer patients are still troubled by many problems during the postoperative recovery period. Medical staff should design and implement effective evaluations and targeted interventions for patients' physical and mental health as soon as possible to improve patients' physical and mental health, as well as their quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.