Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39082810›Full record

SynthesisApplied and environmental microbiology2024

A host of issues: pseudoreplication in host-microbiota studies.

Hannah McKinnon Reish, Lindsey Dewey, Lucas J Kirschman

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hannah McKinnon ReishDepartment of Biology, Southeast Missouri State University, Cape Girardeau, Missouri, USA.
Lindsey DeweyDepartment of Biology, Southeast Missouri State University, Cape Girardeau, Missouri, USA.
Lucas J KirschmanDepartment of Biology, Southeast Missouri State University, Cape Girardeau, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2625-3124

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pseudoreplication compromises the validity of research by treating non-independent samples as independent replicates. This review examines the prevalence of pseudoreplication in host-microbiota studies, highlighting the critical need for rigorous experimental design and appropriate statistical analysis. We systematically reviewed 115 manuscripts on host-microbiota interactions. Our analysis revealed that 22% of the papers contained pseudoreplication, primarily due to co-housed organisms, whereas 52% lacked sufficient methodological details. The remaining 26% adequately addressed pseudoreplication through proper experimental design or statistical analysis. The high incidence of pseudoreplication and insufficient information underscores the importance of methodological reporting and statistical rigor to ensure reproducibility of host-microbiota research.

Indexed as

Host Microbial InteractionsMicrobiotaAnimalsHumansReproducibility of ResultsResearch Designexperimental unithost–microbiotaindividual replicatemixed modelspseudoreplication

Identifiers

PMID39082810
PMCPMC11337823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.