Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39082556›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de enfermagem2024

Telenursing in the postoperative period: a scoping review.

Viviane Cristina de Albuquerque Gimenez, Graziela Maria Ferraz de Almeida, Claudia Maria Silva Cyrino, Cassiane de Santana Lemos, Carolina Favoretto, Marla Andreia Garcia de Avila

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Viviane Cristina de Albuquerque GimenezUniversidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho". Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0095-2840
Graziela Maria Ferraz de AlmeidaUniversidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho". Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5611-3552
Claudia Maria Silva CyrinoUniversidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho". Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2442-2606
Cassiane de Santana LemosUniversidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho". Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0497-2272
Carolina FavorettoUniversidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho". Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4309-1590
Marla Andreia Garcia de AvilaUniversidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho". Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6652-4427

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesto map available evidence on telenursing use in the postoperative period and its impact on patient outcomes.

methodsa scoping review, conducted according to the JBI model and the PRISMA-ScR checklist. The search was carried out in the CINAHL, Embase, LILACS, PubMed, Web of Science, SciELO, Scopus and Cochrane Library databases.

resultstwelve studies were included, published between 2011 and 2023, 66.6% of which were in developed countries. Of the positive outcomes, we highlight improved levels of disability, autonomy and quality of life, lower rates of post-operative complications, pain and reduced costs. Telephone monitoring was the most widely used modality, but there were few studies in the pediatric context and in Brazil.

conclusionsof the studies, 11 (91.6%) identified at least one positive outcome in telenursing use and none showed negative aspects in the postoperative period. The role of nurses in digital health needs further study.

Indexed as

TelenursingBrazilHumansPostoperative PeriodQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID39082556
PMCPMC11290728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.