Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39082531›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de enfermagem2024

Healthcare judicialization: an analysis of indicators and official data on medications.

Nádia Bernardinis, Vanessa Terezinha Gubert, Cristiane Munaretto Ferreira, Jorge Otávio Maia Barreto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nádia BernardinisUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul. Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1779-6709
Vanessa Terezinha GubertUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul. Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9361-2780
Cristiane Munaretto FerreiraUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul. Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0438-047X
Jorge Otávio Maia BarretoFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7648-0472

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesto analyze judicial demands for medications in Campo Grande, Brazil, between July 2018 and June 2020.

methodsthe four dimensions of the Manual of Indicators for Evaluation and Monitoring of Judicial Demands for Medications were examined.

results676 judicial processes were identified, corresponding to 1006 requests for 284 different medications. In 92.74% of the processes, access to medications was granted, with 88.80% granted on an urgent basis. The median time between the decision and delivery of the medication was 146 days. The average monthly cost of acquiring medications was R$ 2,183.68 Brazilian reais. Among the identified medications, 90.22% had at least one therapeutic alternative available in the public healthcare system.

conclusionscharacterizing and analyzing judicial demands related to medications can support discussions on updating medication lists and clinical protocols, organizing healthcare services, allocating resources, and implementing actions to reduce judicialization.

Indexed as

Drug PrescriptionsLegislation, DrugBrazilHumans

Identifiers

PMID39082531
PMCPMC11290738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.