Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39082420›Full record

Observational studyJournal of the American Heart Association2024

Eighteen-Month Real-World Experience Using Mavacamten for Treatment of Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in a Racially Diverse Population.

Diego Ramonfaur, Alessio Gasperetti, Victoria E Blake, Bryana Rivers, Ali A Kassamali, Edward K Kasper, Lili A Barouch, Katherine C Wu, Jose A Madrazo, Richard T Carrick

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Diego RamonfaurDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD.ORCID 0000-0003-3884-149X
Alessio GasperettiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD.ORCID 0000-0003-3432-070X
Victoria E BlakeDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD.ORCID 0000-0001-6237-3062
Bryana RiversDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD.
Ali A KassamaliDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD.
Edward K KasperDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD.ORCID 0000-0002-5730-5433
Lili A BarouchDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD.ORCID 0000-0001-8320-0806
Katherine C WuDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD.ORCID 0000-0003-4958-5145
Jose A MadrazoDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD.ORCID 0000-0002-9966-2703
Richard T CarrickDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD.ORCID 0000-0001-5589-1216

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy have increased symptomatic burden. Mavacamten was recently approved for treatment of obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy based on 2 randomized controlled trials. However, its use under real-world conditions and in diverse populations is under-studied. METHODS AND

resultsThis was a prospective observational cohort study of patients seen at the Johns Hopkins HCM center and prescribed mavacamten for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy between July 7, 2022 and January 6, 2024. Patients were followed longitudinally, with serial echocardiography and clinical evaluation as mandated by the risk evaluation and mitigation strategy program. Sixty-six patients received mavacamten (mean age 59 years, 47% male, 29% non-White [Black, Hispanic/Latino, Asian, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander], 47% obese). Before treatment, all patients had New York Heart Association class II (51.5%) or III (48.5%) heart failure symptoms. Initial maximum peak left ventricular outflow tract gradient was 107±46 mm Hg. Median treatment duration was 9 months. For patients on mavacamten after ≥6 months (n=43), symptoms improved by ≥1 New York Heart Association class in 72% of patients, and peak left ventricular outflow tract gradient decreased by 80±46 mm Hg, eliminating hemodynamically significant left ventricular outflow tract obstruction in 79.1% of patients. Mavacamten was temporarily discontinued in 3 patients due to left ventricular ejection fraction decrease <50%. There were no medication-related adverse events. Effectiveness and safety were similar between White and non-White patients, but symptomatic relief was attenuated in patients with body-mass index ≥35 kg/m

conclusionsMavacamten was effective and safe when used under real-world conditions in a racially diverse population of symptomatic patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Patients with comorbid obesity were less likely to experience symptomatic improvement while on mavacamten.

Indexed as

Cardiomyopathy, HypertrophicAgedBenzylaminesEchocardiographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesPyrimidinonesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUracilVentricular Function, LeftBenzylaminesMYK-461PyrimidinonesUracilechocardiographyhypertrophic cardiomyopathyLVOT obstructionmavacamtenobesity

Identifiers

PMID39082420
PMCPMC11964038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.