Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39082413›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the American Heart Association2024

Sex Differences and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Myocardial Infarction With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries: A Meta-Analysis.

Song P Ang, Jia E Chia, Chayakrit Krittanawong, Kwan Lee, Jose Iglesias, Kanchan Misra, Debabrata Mukherjee

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Women's cardiovascular health in 2025:Saudi medical journal · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Racial and ethnic differences in COVID-19-associated septic shock.World journal of critical care medicine · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Song P AngDepartment of Internal Medicine Rutgers Health/Community Medical Center Toms River NJ.ORCID 0000-0001-8557-9880
Jia E ChiaDepartment of Internal Medicine Texas Tech University Health Science Center El Paso TX.
Chayakrit KrittanawongCardiology Division NYU Langone Health and NYU School of Medicine New York NY.
Kwan LeeDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Phoenix AZ.ORCID 0000-0001-6302-9925
Jose IglesiasDepartment of Internal Medicine Rutgers Health/Community Medical Center Toms River NJ.ORCID 0000-0001-7851-0498
Kanchan MisraDepartment of Radiology Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School New Brunswick NJ.
Debabrata MukherjeeDepartment of Internal Medicine Texas Tech University Health Science Center El Paso TX.ORCID 0000-0002-5131-3694

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is more common in women, it is unknown whether sex is a risk factor for adverse outcomes in patients with MINOCA. We aimed to investigate the relationship between sex differences and outcomes of patients with MINOCA. METHODS AND

resultsA systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases from their inception until August 2023 for relevant studies. End points were pooled using the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman random-effects model as odds ratio (OR) with 95% CIs. Nine studies, involving 30 281 patients with MINOCA (comprising 18 079 women and 12 202 men), were included in the study. Women were older and had a higher prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, and stroke compared with men. The median duration of follow-up was 3.5 years, with an interquartile range of 2.2 to 4.2 years. Pooled analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in the risk of all-cause mortality (OR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.87-1.22]), major adverse cardiovascular events (OR, 1.18 [95% CI, 0.89-1.58]), heart failure (OR, 1.32 [95% CI, 0.57-3.03]), stroke (OR, 1.13 [95% CI, 0.56-2.26]), and myocardial infarction (OR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.29-3.76]) between the 2 groups. Regarding short-term outcomes, women had a significantly higher risk of in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events compared with men (OR, 1.33 [95% CI, 1.16-1.53]) whereas there was no significant difference in the risk of in-hospital mortality (OR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.64-1.28]) between the 2 patient groups.

conclusionsDespite the differences in demographics and comorbidity profiles, there was no significant difference in the long-term outcomes for patients with MINOCA between sexes. However, it is noteworthy that women experienced a higher risk of in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events compared with men.

Indexed as

Myocardial InfarctionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMINOCARisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSex FactorsfemalemaleMINOCAmortalitysex differences

Identifiers

PMID39082413
PMCPMC11964081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.