Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39082272›Full record

SynthesisEmerging microbes & infections2024

Global perspectives on smallpox vaccine against monkeypox: a comprehensive meta-analysis and systematic review of effectiveness, protection, safety and cross-immunogenicity.

Hao Liu, Wenjing Wang, Yang Zhang, Fuchun Wang, Junyi Duan, Tao Huang, Xiaojie Huang, Tong Zhang

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Emerging microbes & infections, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Vaccine safety surveillance during an mpox outbreak, Germany, June 2022 to February 2024.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hao LiuClinical and Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Wenjing WangClinical and Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yang ZhangClinical and Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Fuchun WangClinical and Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Junyi DuanClinical and Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Tao HuangClinical and Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Xiaojie HuangClinical and Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Tong ZhangClinical and Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A large outbreak of monkeypox occurred in 2022, and most people lack immunity to orthopoxvirus. Smallpox vaccination is essential for preventing further smallpox outbreaks. This study evaluated the effectiveness, protection, safety, and cross-immunogenicity of smallpox vaccine in preventing monkeypox infection. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from database inception to 10 March 2024. We included studies involving "monkeypox virus" and "vaccinations", and excluded reviews, animal studies, and articles with missing or duplicate data. A total of 37 studies with 57,693 participants were included in the final analysis. The effectiveness data showed that monkeypox infection rates were lower in the smallpox-vaccinated group than in the unvaccinated group (risk ratio [RR]: 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.31-0.68). The protection data showed that smallpox vaccination effectively reduced the risk of severe monkeypox infection (RR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.42-0.87). Third-generation vaccines showed greater efficacy (RR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.22-0.56) than first-generation vaccines. The number of doses of smallpox vaccine has no significant effect on monkeypox. Safety data showed that adverse reactions after smallpox vaccination were mainly mild and included local erythema, swelling, induration, itching, and pain. Meanwhile, we found that smallpox vaccination could induce the production of neutralizing antibodies against monkeypox. Our findings offer compelling evidence supporting the clinical application of the smallpox vaccine for preventing monkeypox and advocate that high-risk groups should be prioritized for receiving one dose of the smallpox vaccine if the vaccine stockpile is low.

Indexed as

Mpox, MonkeypoxSmallpox VaccineAnimalsAntibodies, ViralHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineMonkeypox virusSmallpoxVaccinationVaccine EfficacyAntibodies, ViralSmallpox VaccineeffectivenessimmunogenicityMonkeypoxsafetysmallpoxvaccine

Identifiers

PMID39082272
PMCPMC11332295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.