Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39082244›Full record

ReviewProceedings. Biological sciences2024

The changing landscape of text mining: a review of approaches for ecology and evolution.

Maxwell J Farrell, Nicolas Le Guillarme, Liam Brierley, Bronwen Hunter, Daan Scheepens, Anna Willoughby, Andrew Yates, Nicole Mideo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. New opportunities and challenges for conservation evidence synthesis from advances in natural language processing.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maxwell J FarrellDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0452-6993
Nicolas Le GuillarmeUniversité Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, LECA, Laboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine, Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4559-7579
Liam BrierleyMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3026-4723
Bronwen HunterSchool of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7508-7011
Daan ScheepensDivision of Biosciences, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0009-0007-7574-9621
Anna WilloughbyOdum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0504-0605
Andrew YatesInformatics Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5970-880X
Nicole MideoDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8719-3620

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In ecology and evolutionary biology, the synthesis and modelling of data from published literature are commonly used to generate insights and test theories across systems. However, the tasks of searching, screening, and extracting data from literature are often arduous. Researchers may manually process hundreds to thousands of articles for systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and compiling synthetic datasets. As relevant articles expand to tens or hundreds of thousands, computer-based approaches can increase the efficiency, transparency and reproducibility of literature-based research. Methods available for text mining are rapidly changing owing to developments in machine learning-based language models. We review the growing landscape of approaches, mapping them onto three broad paradigms (frequency-based approaches, traditional Natural Language Processing and deep learning-based language models). This serves as an entry point to learn foundational and cutting-edge concepts, vocabularies, and methods to foster integration of these tools into ecological and evolutionary research. We cover approaches for modelling ecological texts, generating training data, developing custom models and interacting with large language models and discuss challenges and possible solutions to implementing these methods in ecology and evolution.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionData MiningEcologyNatural Language ProcessingMachine Learningdatabase constructiondeep learningInformation Extractionlarge language modelsliterature synthesisNatural Language Processing

Identifiers

PMID39082244
PMCPMC11289731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.