Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39082201›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing practice2024

Nurses' experiences and perceptions of running nurse-led clinics: A scoping review.

Xiaomeng Pu, Gulzar Malik, Christine Murray

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiaomeng PuPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4396-382X
Gulzar MalikSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Christine MurraySchool of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo explore what is known about nurses' experiences and perceptions of running nurse-led clinics.

backgroundNurse-led clinics were established to address health care needs. In collaboration with medical practitioners, advanced practice nurses may take a selected group of patients and manage their ongoing healthcare independently. Their experiences in running nurse-led clinics directly impact patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes.

designScoping review of the peer-reviewed literature. DATA SOURCE: Systematic search through CINAHL, Medline, PsycINFO and Web of Science databases from January 2010 to September 2023. REVIEW

methodsThis scoping review is guided by the updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping review from Joanna Briggs Institute.

resultsOf 2747 retrieved articles, 15 were included in this review. Synthesis of the findings revealed that nurses believed implementing nurse-led clinics was beneficial to themselves, patients, and healthcare systems. However, they faced challenges in running nurse-led clinics, including insufficient support, teamwork obstacles and lack of role recognition.

conclusionNurses need to be proactive in promoting their clinics and overcoming challenges. Healthcare organizations are responsible for creating a positive culture to support nurse-led services. Future research should focus on ways to increase global awareness of nurse-led clinics.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAmbulatory Care FacilitiesHumansNurse's RolePatient SatisfactionPractice Patterns, Nurses'advanced practice nurseexperiencenurse‐led clinicnurse‐led servicesnursesperceptionscoping review

Identifiers

PMID39082201
PMCPMC11608926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.