ArticleACS sensors2024
Label-Free Single-Cell Cancer Classification from the Spatial Distribution of Adhesion Contact Kinetics.
Article in ACS sensors, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Structural, Compositional, and Dielectric State Profiling in Label-Free Single-Cell Monitoring.Small methods · 2026Review
- Impedance Sensing and Characterization of Single-Cell Migration in Channels with Selective Protein Coating.Biosensors · 2026Article
- Label-Free Cancer Detection Methods Based on Biophysical Cell Phenotypes.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Versatile Image-Assisted Cell Sorting by Selective Trapping with Spatiotemporal Multiparameter Targeting.ACS sensors · 2025Article
- Directing Cell Phenotype: Quantitative Single-Cell Migration Assay Leveraging Tunable Extracellular Surfaces.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is an increasing need for simple-to-use, noninvasive, and rapid tools to identify and separate various cell types or subtypes at the single-cell level with sufficient throughput. Often, the selection of cells based on their direct biological activity would be advantageous. These steps are critical in immune therapy, regenerative medicine, cancer diagnostics, and effective treatment. Today, live cell selection procedures incorporate some kind of biomolecular labeling or other invasive measures, which may impact cellular functionality or cause damage to the cells. In this study, we first introduce a highly accurate single-cell segmentation methodology by combining the high spatial resolution of a phase-contrast microscope with the adhesion kinetic recording capability of a resonant waveguide grating (RWG) biosensor. We present a classification workflow that incorporates the semiautomatic separation and classification of single cells from the measurement data captured by an RWG-based biosensor for adhesion kinetics data and a phase-contrast microscope for highly accurate spatial resolution. The methodology was tested with one healthy and six cancer cell types recorded with two functionalized coatings. The data set contains over 5000 single-cell samples for each surface and over 12,000 samples in total. We compare and evaluate the classification using these two types of surfaces (fibronectin and noncoated) with different segmentation strategies and measurement timespans applied to our classifiers. The overall classification performance reached nearly 95% with the best models showing that our proof-of-concept methodology could be adapted for real-life automatic diagnostics use cases. The label-free measurement technique has no impact on cellular functionality, directly measures cellular activity, and can be easily tuned to a specific application by varying the sensor coating. These features make it suitable for applications requiring further processing of selected cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.