Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39082056›Full record

ReviewArrhythmia & electrophysiology review2024

British Heart Rhythm Society Standards for Implantation and Follow-up of Cardiac Rhythm Management Devices in Adults: January 2024 Update.

Paul Foley, Honey Thomas, Mark Dayer, Sophie Robinson, Vivienne Ezzatt, Matthew Swift, Nadiya Johal, Eleri Roberts

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Improving implant training for physicians and their teams in under-represented regions.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  7. Syncope in ICD recipients: a single centre experience.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Paul FoleyWiltshire Cardiac Centre, Great Western Hospital Swindon, UK.
Honey ThomasBritish Heart Rhythm Society Cheshire, UK.
Mark DayerSomerset NHS Foundation Trust Taunton, Somerset, UK.
Sophie RobinsonBritish Heart Rhythm Society Cheshire, UK.
Vivienne EzzattBritish Heart Rhythm Society Cheshire, UK.
Matthew SwiftWiltshire Cardiac Centre, Great Western Hospital Swindon, UK.
Nadiya JohalWiltshire Cardiac Centre, Great Western Hospital Swindon, UK.
Eleri RobertsDepartment of Cardiology, Wythenshawe Hospital Manchester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This updated guidance is designed to help with implantation and follow-up with agreed standards of practice. The update includes new guidance on subcutaneous defibrillators, leadless pacemakers and conduction system pacing. It includes new guidance on considerations at the time of a potential box change and techniques to be considered to minimise the risk of infection.

Indexed as

cardiac resynchronisationconduction system pacingimplantable cardioverter defibrillatorsleadlessPacemaker

Identifiers

PMID39082056
PMCPMC11287656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.