ArticleHeliyon2024
Development and validation of a machine learning-based interpretable model for predicting sepsis by complete blood cell parameters.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sepsis, a severe infectious disease, carries a high mortality rate. Early detection and prompt treatment are crucial for reducing mortality and improving prognosis. The aim of this research is to develop a clinical prediction model using machine learning algorithms, leveraging complete blood cell (CBC) parameters, to detect sepsis at an early stage. Methods: The study involved 572 patients admitted to West China Hospital of Sichuan University between July 2020 and September 2021. Among them, 215 were diagnosed with sepsis, while 357 had local infections. Demographic information was collected, and 57 CBC parameters were analyzed to identify potential predictors using techniques such as the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost). The prediction model was built using Logistic Regression and evaluated for diagnostic specificity, discrimination, and clinical applicability including metrics such as the area under the curve (AUC), calibration curve, clinical impact curve, and clinical decision curve. Additionally, the model's diagnostic performance was assessed on a separate validation cohort. Shapley's additive explanations (SHAP), and breakdown (BD) profiles were used to explain the contribution of each variable in predicting the outcome. Results: Among all the machine learning methods' prediction models, the LASSO-based model (λ = min) demonstrated the highest diagnostic performance in both the discovery cohort (AUC = 0.9446, Conclusions: The predictive model based on CBC parameters can be utilized as an effective approach for the early detection of sepsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.