Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39082006›Full record

ArticleJournal of machine learning research : JMLR2024

Effect-Invariant Mechanisms for Policy Generalization.

Sorawit Saengkyongam, Niklas Pfister, Predrag Klasnja, Susan Murphy, Jonas Peters

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of machine learning research : JMLR, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sorawit SaengkyongamSeminar for Statistics, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Niklas PfisterDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, University of Copenhagena, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Predrag KlasnjaSchool of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Susan MurphyDepartment of Statistics, Department of Computer Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Jonas PetersSeminar for Statistics, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.

Funding

Pilot and Mentoring CoreP50DA054039 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Inbal Billie Nahum-Shani · 2021 to 2026
$18.2M
TR&D3 - Rapid Translation of AI-powered Temporally Precise mHealth Interventions via Efficient and Embeddable Trustworthy Biomarker ImplementationsP41EB028242 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS · PI Emre Ertin · 2020 to 2026
$9.5M
Heart Steps: Adaptive mHealth intervention for physical-activity maintenanceR01HL125440 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Predrag Klasnja · 2015 to 2026
$3.8M
Operationalizing Behavioral Theory for mHealth: Dynamics, Context, and PersonalizationU01CA229445 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI KLASNJA, PREDRAG, MARLIN, BENJAMIN M. · 2018 to 2022
$2.1M
SCH: Control Systems Engineering for Counteracting Notification Fatigue: An Examination of Health Behavior Change R01LM013107 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI HEKLER, ERIC, KLASNJA, PREDRAG · 2019 to 2022
$995k
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA229445NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL125440NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB028242NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA054039NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Policy learning is an important component of many real-world learning systems. A major challenge in policy learning is how to adapt efficiently to unseen environments or tasks. Recently, it has been suggested to exploit invariant conditional distributions to learn models that generalize better to unseen environments. However, assuming invariance of entire conditional distributions (which we call full invariance) may be too strong of an assumption in practice. In this paper, we introduce a relaxation of full invariance called effect-invariance (e-invariance for short) and prove that it is sufficient, under suitable assumptions, for zero-shot policy generalization. We also discuss an extension that exploits e-invariance when we have a small sample from the test environment, enabling few-shot policy generalization. Our work does not assume an underlying causal graph or that the data are generated by a structural causal model; instead, we develop testing procedures to test e-invariance directly from data. We present empirical results using simulated data and a mobile health intervention dataset to demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach.

Indexed as

causalitydistribution generalizationdomain adaptationinvariancepolicy learning

Identifiers

PMID39082006
PMCPMC11286230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.