ArticleOncology letters2024
Ramucirumab in second‑line advanced colorectal cancer therapy: A study on therapeutic outcomes and hepatic sinusoidal platelet aggregation.
Article in Oncology letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeting cancer signaling pathways and their therapeutic strategies.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Comparison of the efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization combined with radiofrequency ablation or sintilimab and bevacizumab for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Endothelial cell in tumor angiogenesis: Origins, mechanisms, and therapeutic implication.Genes & diseases · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study investigated the role of ramucirumab (RAM) in treating liver metastases (LMs) as a second-line or salvage treatment in patients with advanced CRC. Of the 36 patients, 21 (58%) received RAM plus folinic acid, fluorouracil and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as second-line treatment, whereas 15 (42%) received it in a salvage setting. The median overall survival time was 23 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 12-34 months] for those in the second-line treatment group and 8 months (95% CI, 5-19 months) for those in the salvage treatment group. Of the 36 patients, 14 (39%) underwent surgical resection of LMs during chemotherapy. A total of 6 patients underwent surgical resection for LMs for the first time during second-line RAM plus FOLFIRI (RAM-LM); of the remaining 8 patients, 6 underwent resection of LMs during first-line bevacizumab (BEV)-based chemotherapy (BEV-LM). Immunohistochemical analysis of CD42b showed that the platelet aggregation score (CD42b score), which ranges from 0 (absence of deposition) to 3 (presence of linear deposition), tended to decrease with the increasing duration of treatment with both RAM and BEV. Although there was no significant difference in the mean duration of anti-VEGF antibody treatment between the BEV-LM and RAM-LM groups, the median CD42b score was higher in the RAM-LM group (median CD42b score, 3; range, 0-3) compared with that in the BEV-LM group (median CD42b score, 1; range, 0-3; P=0.01), suggesting that RAM induces a different degree of platelet aggregation in liver sinusoids compared to BEV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.