Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39081952›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2024

The multifaceted effects of fluoxetine treatment on cognitive functions.

Estíbaliz Ampuero, Alejandro Luarte, Francisca Sofia Flores, Antonia Ignacia Soto, Catalina Pino, Viviana Silva, Macarena Erlandsen, Teresita Concha, Ursula Wyneken

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Estíbaliz AmpueroLaboratorio Neurofarmacología del Comportamiento, Facultad de Química y Biología, Universidad de Santiago, Santiago, Chile.
Alejandro LuarteLaboratorio Neurociencias, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile.
Francisca Sofia FloresLaboratorio Neurociencias, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile.
Antonia Ignacia SotoLaboratorio Neurociencias, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile.
Catalina PinoLaboratorio Neurociencias, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile.
Viviana SilvaLaboratorio Neurociencias, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile.
Macarena ErlandsenLaboratorio Neurociencias, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile.
Teresita ConchaLaboratorio Neurociencias, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile.
Ursula WynekenLaboratorio Neurociencias, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluoxetine, the prototypical selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), is widely used to treat major depressive disorder (MDD) and a variety of other central nervous system conditions, primarily due to its established clinical safety profile. Although its efficacy in treating depression is well-recognized, the impact of fluoxetine on cognitive functions remains inconsistent and elusive. In this review, we first examine the well-substantiated biological mechanisms underlying fluoxetine's antidepressant effects, which include serotonin reuptake inhibition and activation of TrkB receptors-key to brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) signaling. Subsequently, we delve into the cognitive side effects observed in both preclinical and clinical studies, affecting domains such as memory, attention, and executive functions. While certain studies indicate cognitive improvements in patients with underlying disorders, there is also evidence of negative effects, influenced by variables like gender, duration of treatment, age, disease pathology, and the specifics of cognitive testing. Significantly, the negative cognitive outcomes reported in preclinical research often involve healthy, non-diseased animals. This review underscores the necessity for heightened caution in fluoxetine prescription and further investigation into its potentially detrimental cognitive effects, even when used prophylactically.

Indexed as

antidepressantscognitionmemoryside-effectsSSRIs

Identifiers

PMID39081952
PMCPMC11286485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.