ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2024
Neurodivergent patient experience in a tertiary children's hospital-a qualitative analysis.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient and public involvement and engagement in co-designing guidance for mental health professionals supporting neurodivergent children and young people in child and adolescent mental health services.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Procedural Support for Neurodivergent Children During Medical Procedures: A Scoping Review.Clinical child and family psychology review · 2026Article
- An Evidence-Based and Lived Experience Approach to Improving Therapeutic Environments for Neurodivergent Clients.Health services insights · 2026Review
- Impact of sensory training on healthcare provider care for neurodivergent children.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Sensory processing challenges are commonly encountered in pediatric patients, particularly in those who are neurodivergent. We previously developed a novel clinical pathway (named "Sensory Pathway") which aimed at improving patient care for those with sensory barriers via staff training, provision of sensory toolkits and early integration of families throughout the hospital stay. We hypothesized that utilization of this pathway will result in improved patient experience and provide valuable feedback to improve care. Methods: A voluntary survey was made available to all patients who utilized this resource as part of our hospital wide patient satisfaction survey. Qualitative data was coded using open coding as part of the constant comparison method data using NVivo 12 for Windows software for analysis. Software was used to create word clouds and clusters for visualization, which confirmed the themes and patterns that were noted from initial open coding. Results: Between 2021 and 2022, surveys were obtained from 160 patients who utilized the Sensory Pathway. More than 50% reported that the most helpful components of the pathway were the approach by the staff and sensory tools. The three major themes identified from the survey were (1) Tools and techniques that benefited their children; (2) Positive interactions and communication with the hospital staff, and (3) Suggestions for future improvement. Conclusion: The survey results highlight the importance of having tools readily available to aid with sensory regulation and comfort of patients during healthcare encounters, the value of a positive patient and staff encounter, as well as opportunities for improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.