Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39081796›Full record

ReviewOrthopedic research and reviews2024

Recent Advances in the Design and Application of Shoulder Arthroplasty Implant Systems and Their Impact on Clinical Outcomes: A Comprehensive Review.

John Twomey-Kozak, Kwabena Adu-Kwarteng, Kiera Lunn, Damon Vernon Briggs, Eoghan Hurley, Oke A Anakwenze, Christopher S Klifto

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Orthopedic research and reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. [Analysis of anatomical characteristics of proximal humerus measured based on three-dimensional reconstruction technique and its clinical significance].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

John Twomey-KozakDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Kwabena Adu-Kwarteng *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6064-8616
Kiera Lunn *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2537-1361
Damon Vernon BriggsDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-4145-6765
Eoghan HurleyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Oke A AnakwenzeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Christopher S KliftoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose of Review: This narrative review comprehensively aims to analyze recent advancements in shoulder arthroplasty, focusing on implant systems and their impact on patient outcomes. The purpose is to provide a nuanced understanding of the evolving landscape in shoulder arthroplasty, incorporating scientific, regulatory, and ethical dimensions. Recent Findings: The review synthesizes recent literature on stemless implants, augmented glenoid components, inlay vs onlay configurations, convertible stems, and associated complications. Notable findings include improved patient-reported outcomes with stemless implants, variations in outcomes between inlay and onlay configurations, and the potential advantages of convertible stems. Additionally, the regulatory landscape, particularly the FDA's 510(k) pathway, is explored alongside ethical considerations, emphasizing the need for standardized international regulations. Summary: Recent innovations in shoulder arthroplasty showcase promising advancements, with stemless implants demonstrating improved patient outcomes. The review underscores the necessity for ongoing research to address unresolved aspects and highlights the importance of a standardized regulatory framework to ensure patient safety globally. The synthesis of recent findings contributes to a comprehensive understanding of the current state of shoulder arthroplasty, guiding future research and clinical practices.

Indexed as

glenoid componentsinnovations in arthroplastypatient outcomesrTSAshoulder arthroplastystemless implants

Identifiers

PMID39081796
PMCPMC11288362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.