ReviewKidney international reports2024
Renal Response Criteria for Clinical Trials in Amyloid Light Chain Amyloidosis.
Review in Kidney international reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Urine-free response criteria predict progression-free survival in multiple myeloma: a post hoc analysis of BMT CTN 0702.Leukemia · 2025Article
- Systemic amyloid light-chain amyloidosis beyond ANDROMEDA: Diagnostic challenges and therapeutic updates.CA: a cancer journal for cliniciansReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immunoglobin light chain (AL) amyloidosis is a rare disease characterized by organ deposition of amyloid fibrils, most commonly in the heart and kidney. Disease heterogeneity necessitates organ-specific assessment to determine prognosis and response or progression. To facilitate development of new therapies, the Amyloidosis Forum (a public-private partnership between the US Food and Drug Administration and the nonprofit Amyloidosis Research Consortium) held a series of meetings and formed multiple working groups to identify clinical trial end points and analytic strategies. This report summarizes the recommendations of Renal Working Group. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and proteinuria were selected to evaluate eligibility, response, and/or progression in the context of investigational clinical trials for patients with AL amyloidosis. Accurate response assessments at the earliest possible time point were emphasized. The context of use, specific patient population, and the investigational therapeutic mechanism should ultimately drive selection of appropriate end points to evaluate renal response/progression in AL amyloidosis clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.