ArticleKidney international reports2024
Exploring Potential Gender-Based Disparities in Referral for Transplant, Activation on the Waitlist and Kidney Transplantation in a Canadian Cohort.
Article in Kidney international reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sex and Intersectional Disparities in Access to Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation: A 17-Year Population-Based Cohort Study.Nephrology (Carlton, Vic.) · 2026Article
- Kidney Transplant Referral, Activation, and Transplantation Rates in a Single-Center Cohort of Older Adults in Nova Scotia.Clinical transplantation · 2026Article
- Association Between Sex and Kidney Transplant Referral, Living Donor Contacts, Waitlisting and Kidney Transplant: A Population-Based Cohort Study.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2026Article
- Similarities and Differences Between Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell and Organ Transplantation and What We Can Learn From Each Other to Guide Global Health Strategy.Clinical transplantation · 2025Review
- Sex Differences in Excess Mortality Among Waitlisted Kidney, Heart, and Liver Transplant Candidates.Transplantation direct · 2025Article
- Life on the Line: Prioritizing Equity in Kidney Transplantation for Populations Marginalized by Race and Ethnicity.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2025Article
- Using Unsupervised Clustering to Characterize Phenotypes Among Older Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Cohort Study.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In the United States, women are less likely to be referred, activated on the waitlist, or undergo kidney transplant (KT) than men; contemporary Canadian data regarding access to transplant for women are lacking. Methods: Among patients initiating dialysis in Nova Scotia (NS), Canada from 2010 to 2020, we examined the association of candidate gender with overall access to KT, including the following: (i) odds of transplant referral within 1 year of dialysis initiation, (ii) odds of activation on the transplant waitlist (if referred), and (iii) time-to-transplantation (if activated) using logistic regression or Cox proportional hazards models as appropriate. Results: Among 749 patients deemed potentially eligible for transplant, women had lower transplant rates than men (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.53, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.36-0.78); this was amplified among patients aged >60 years (aHR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.09-0.69). Compared with men, women had a lower adjusted odds of transplant referral (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.35-0.93) by 1 year after dialysis initiation. Among those referred, women had lower odds of waitlist activation than men (aOR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.30-1.11); and among those activated, women had lower hazard of KT (aHR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.51-1.09), though these differences were not statistically significant. Women in NS experience lower overall access to transplant, including less referral, activation and KT compared with men. Conclusion: Gender-based barriers to any of (or in this case each of) referral, activation, or transplantation result in inequities in access; identification of disparities at these critical decision points is an important first step toward ensuring equal access for all.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.