ArticleKidney international reports2024
Living with Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome in the Netherlands: Patient and Family Perspective.
Article in Kidney international reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Which Factors Influence Decisions to Withdraw from Eculizumab: A Qualitative Study of Patients Diagnosed with aHUS.The patient · 2026Article
- Research Gaps and Priorities for aHUS in the Gulf Cooperation Countries (GCC): Findings from a Payer-Focused Expert Meeting.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2026Article
- Long-term outcome and management of complement-mediated thrombotic microangiopathy/aHUS.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025Review
- The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System perspective of adults with long-standing atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025Article
- Neurological Manifestations of Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review.Brain sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) poses a significant health challenge due to its rarity and severity within the spectrum of thrombotic microangiopathy. Despite efforts to optimize and personalize health care for patients with aHUS, understanding the individual experiences, needs, and desires of patients with aHUS and their relatives remains limited. Methods: Here, we present a nationwide, exploratory, qualitative interview study with a direct content analysis approach. In-depth interviews and a 6-week evaluation were audio-recorded and conducted using a semistructured topic guide, based on the Institute for Positive Health (IPH) model. Results: Analysis of 10 interviews involving 6 patients with aHUS and 13 relatives revealed the prevalence of long-term disease symptoms in adult patients, notably fatigue, which significantly impacted daily functioning. Moreover, the resilience demonstrated by patients and their relatives was noteworthy; however, the acute phase of aHUS and the unpredictable nature of disease recurrence could profoundly affect mental well-being. The emotional toll of aHUS is pervasive, with feelings of fear, guilt, and trauma persisting across disease phases in both patients and relatives. Challenges in medical care, including delays in diagnosis and the need for personalized and uniform protocols, were highlighted. Support was deemed crucial, indicating the necessity for enhancements in the accessibility to comprehensible disease information and psychological counseling. Finally, complexities surrounding genetic testing and carriership were discussed. Conclusion: This study underscores the profound, enduring, and multifaced impact of aHUS. The insights gleaned from the experiences and needs of patients with aHUS and their relatives could lay the foundation for development and implementation of more personalized innovations in aHUS health care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.