ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024
AI-driven generalized polynomial transformation models for unsupervised fundus image registration.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in ophthalmic optical coherence tomography angiography: a bibliometric analysis.International journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- A Multi-view Open-access Dataset of Paired Knee MRI for Motion Artifact Removal.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Multimodal AI diagnostic system for neuromyelitis optica based on ultrawide-field fundus photography.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We introduce a novel AI-driven approach to unsupervised fundus image registration utilizing our Generalized Polynomial Transformation (GPT) model. Through the GPT, we establish a foundational model capable of simulating diverse polynomial transformations, trained on a large synthetic dataset to encompass a broad range of transformation scenarios. Additionally, our hybrid pre-processing strategy aims to streamline the learning process by offering model-focused input. We evaluated our model's effectiveness on the publicly available AREDS dataset by using standard metrics such as image-level and parameter-level analyzes. Linear regression analysis reveals an average Pearson correlation coefficient (R) of 0.9876 across all quadratic transformation parameters. Image-level evaluation, comprising qualitative and quantitative analyzes, showcases significant improvements in Structural Similarity Index (SSIM) and Normalized Cross Correlation (NCC) scores, indicating its robust performance. Notably, precise matching of the optic disc and vessel locations with minimal global distortion are observed. These findings underscore the potential of GPT-based approaches in image registration methodologies, promising advancements in diagnosis, treatment planning, and disease monitoring in ophthalmology and beyond.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.