Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39081671›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2024

The Performance of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) Virus Using the Colorimetric Reverse-Transcription Loop Mediated Isothermal Amplification (RT-LAMP) Method in Saliva Specimens of Suspected COVID-19 Patients.

Dewi Kartika Turbawaty, Andy Sudjadi, Leni Lismayanti, Tiene Rostini, Verina Logito

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of general medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dewi Kartika TurbawatyDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Padjadjaran University/ Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0001-5391-7574
Andy SudjadiDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Padjadjaran University/ Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia.
Leni LismayantiDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Padjadjaran University/ Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia.
Tiene RostiniDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Padjadjaran University/ Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia.
Verina LogitoDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Padjadjaran University/ Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0003-3521-9283

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Corona Virus Disease-19 (COVID-19) is a disease caused by Severe-Acute-Respiratory-Syndrome-Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). The most reliable and widely accepted method for diagnosing this infection, despite facing various challenges, is the Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) method, which utilizes nasopharyngeal swab sample. Reverse-transcription loop mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) is a simpler nucleic acid amplification method compared to the RT-PCR method. This method has several advantages, including: of amplification at constant temperature, faster results, and potentially greater examination capacity. Purpose: This study aimed to compare the validity of the RT-LAMP method using saliva specimens with that of the RT-PCR method using nasopharyngeal smears. Methods: This was an analytical observational study with a cross-sectional design. The participants were inpatients in the COVID-19 special isolation building of Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, Indonesia with a probable (clinical symptoms of covid, but not confirm NAAT examination) or confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 from September 2021 to February 2022. The inclusion criteria are COVID-19 patients with symptoms, adult subjects, and composite mentions. Patients who were unable to secrete saliva were also excluded. Results: In total, 118 specimens were collected. The validity test results of the saliva specimens using the RT-LAMP method showed sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV), of 65.5%, 100%, 100%, and 75%, respectively. The results increased in subjects treated between 3 and 7 days after symptom onset ie 73.2%, 100%, 100%, and 82.3%, respectively. Conclusion: The very strong specificity accompanied by good sensitivity and NPV in the group of subjects treated 3-7 days after the onset of symptoms indicates that the RT-LAMP method using saliva specimens can be an efficient and reliable alternative tool in detecting the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Indexed as

COVID-19RT-LAMPRT-PCRsalivaSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID39081671
PMCPMC11288315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.