Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39081627›Full record

ArticleInterface focus2024

The biomechanics of splitting hairs.

David Taylor, Ellen Barton, Isobel Duffy, Ramona Enea-Casse, Guillaume Marty, Robert Teeling, Roberto Santoprete

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interface focus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

David TaylorTrinity Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5470-2062
Ellen BartonTrinity Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Isobel DuffyTrinity Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Ramona Enea-CasseL'Oréal Centre Charles Zviak, Saint-Ouen 93400, France.
Guillaume MartyL'Oréal Centre Charles Zviak, Saint-Ouen 93400, France.
Robert TeelingTrinity Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Roberto SantopreteL'Oréal Aulnay, Aulnay-sous-Bois 93601, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Splitting of hair, creating 'split ends', is a very common problem which has been extensively documented. However, the mechanics underlying the splitting phenomenon are poorly understood. This is partly owing to the lack of a test in which splitting can be generated and quantified under laboratory conditions. We developed three new tests, known as 'loop tensile', 'moving loop' and 'moving loop fatigue', aiming to simulate the mechanical environment of tangles of hair strands during combing. We tested straight strands of human hair, comparing low-quality hair (from a subject who experienced split ends) with hair from a control (non-splitting) subject. Significant differences were found, especially in the moving loop fatigue test where the low-quality hair failed in fewer cycles. Splitting occurred in both types of hair, but with the crucial difference that in the low-quality hair, splits originated inside the hair strand and propagated longitudinally over considerable distances, while in the control hair, splits originated at the strand surface and remained short. Bleaching of the control hair changed its behaviour, making it similar to that of the low-quality hair. Some simple calculations emphasized the role of longitudinal shear stress and shear stress intensity in generating microcracks which could then propagate within the moving loop, paving the way for a future theoretical model of the splitting mechanism.

Indexed as

breakfatiguehairsplitstrengthtoughness

Identifiers

PMID39081627
PMCPMC11285785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.