ArticleInterface focus2024
Interaction of a non-axisymmetric artificial single spatula with rough surfaces.
Article in Interface focus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hair-like attachment structures are frequently used by animals to create stable contact with rough surfaces. Previous studies focused primarily on axisymmetric biomimetic models of artificial spatulas, such as those with a mushroom-shaped and cylinder-shaped geometry, in order to simulate the so-called gecko effect. Here, two geometric prototypes of artificial adhesive structures with non-axisymmetric properties were designed. The investigation of the prototype's interactions with rough surfaces was carried out using the finite element software ABAQUS. Under increasing vertical displacement, the effect of asperity size on the contact pressure evolution of the spatula was investigated. It has been demonstrated that the contact behaviour is greatly affected by the flexibility of the spatula, which is caused by its variable thickness. The thinner spatula shows a higher nominal contact area and attaches more strongly to various rough surfaces. Although a thicker spatula is more susceptible to the 'leverage' phenomenon, which occurs when excessively applied displacements prematurely reduce the nominal contact area, it obtains the ability to regulate attachment during unidirectional loading. Two non-axisymmetric prototypes provide different design concepts for the artificial adhesives. It is hoped that this study will provide fresh viewpoints and innovations that contribute to the development of biologically inspired adhesives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.