ArticleJuntendo Iji zasshi = Juntendo medical journal2022
Validity of Diaphragm Volume Measurements Using Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography.
Article in Juntendo Iji zasshi = Juntendo medical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- A Reliable and Robust Method of Measuring Male Pelvic Floor Muscle Volume Using Three-dimensional Computed Tomography.Juntendo Iji zasshi = Juntendo medical journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to measure the diaphragm volume using three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) and verify its validity. Design: This was a retrospective study of existing samples. Methods: Participants comprised five male patients, aged 65-70 years, who underwent preoperative chest CT (with a slice thickness of 0.5 mm) before coronary artery bypass surgery. The diaphragm was selectively extracted using a workstation to reconstruct a stereoscopic image, and the total muscle volume was measured. To confirm the accuracy and reproducibility of diaphragm muscle volume measurements on CT, all cases were measured three times by two observers, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and interobserver correlations were determined. Results: Observers #1 and #2 reported an average diaphragm volume of 256.7±33 cm Conclusions: To our knowledge, this study is the first to standardize the method for measuring the total diaphragm volume and examine the reproducibility and validity of the new method. The diaphragm could be selectively extracted and reconstructed. Measurement of the total diaphragm muscle volume using a workstation to reconstruct a stereoscopic image is feasible and highly reproducible. This technique can be reliably employed to evaluate diaphragm volume, thickness, and morphology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.