ArticleData in brief2024
Three-dimensional, clinically rated posture data from people aged 10 to 69 years.
Article in Data in brief, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Posture evaluation and treatment in adolescents through wearable technology: a systematic review.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Weak posture is a widely recognized problem affecting individuals of all ages, that can lead to back pain, which is a significant socio-economic burden in civil societies. Posture assessment enables the early detection of postural deficiencies, thus enabling proactive interventions. Therefore, it is an important tool for promoting public health, not only in childhood and adolescence. This article provides posture data of 1,149 subjects aged 10 to 69 years measured by stereophotogrammetry. In addition to subject anthropometrics, raw sagittal posture parameters as well as calculated flèche cervicale (FC), flèche lombaire (FL), and kyphosis index (KI) and the respective values normalized to the trunk height (FC%, FL%, KI%) are provided. Further, based on the measurements and a visual inspection, biomedical experts made a classification of the presence of hyperkyphosis of the thoracic spine or hyperlordosis of the lumbar spine. In a second step, these assessments were algorithmically checked for label quality due to possible errors of the raters. Critical cases were reassessed by experts. In addition to the original ratings, these corrected labels are also reported. The data offers potential for data driven objective posture assessment and the development of diagnostic supportive machine learning applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.