Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39081461›Full record

ArticlePathology oncology research : POR2024

The efficacy and safety of second salvage autologous transplantation in myeloma patients.

Reka Rahel Bicsko, Renata Nyilas, Robert Szasz, Laszlo Varoczy, Attila Kiss, Miklos Udvardy, Arpad Illes, Lajos Gergely

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Reka Rahel BicskoDepartment of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Doctoral School of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Internal Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Renata NyilasDepartment of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Doctoral School of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Internal Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Robert SzaszDepartment of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Doctoral School of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Internal Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Laszlo VaroczyDepartment of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Doctoral School of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Internal Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Attila KissDepartment of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Doctoral School of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Internal Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Miklos UdvardyDepartment of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Doctoral School of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Internal Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Arpad IllesDepartment of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Doctoral School of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Internal Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Lajos GergelyDepartment of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Doctoral School of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Internal Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the availability of many novel therapies for multiple myeloma, it remains an incurable disease with relapse fated in almost all patients. In the era of modern agents, second autologous stem cell transplantation still holds its role in patients relapsing after first-line autologous transplant. The authors reviewed a single-center experience with a second auto-SCT for relapsed multiple myeloma. Thirty patients had received a salvage auto-SCT at the institution. The median follow-up after diagnosis was 86 months, and the median time between transplants was 59.1 months. Response before second ASCT was the following: CR - 11 cases, VGPR - 9 cases, PR - 10 cases. Most patients received reduced dose (140 mg/m2) of melphalan as a conditioning regimen for the second auto-SCT. Treatment-related mortality was 3%. With a median follow-up time of 34 months after the second transplant, median progression-free survival was 24 months. The median PFS in the patients achieving CR or VGPR at day 100 after the second transplantation was 32 months. By 15 months, all patients achieved only partial remission progressed, with a median PFS of 8.5 months. During the follow-up period, no MDS or AML developed, and the frequency of second malignancy was also low, 3%. In conclusion, second autologous stem cell transplantation is a well-tolerated and effective treatment option for relapsed multiple myeloma in selected patients, though with a shorter PFS than in first remission.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationMultiple MyelomaSalvage TherapyTransplantation, AutologousAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateTransplantation Conditioningmultiple myelomasalvage therapysalvage transplantationsecond autologous stem cell transplantationsurvival

Identifiers

PMID39081461
PMCPMC11286382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.