ReviewCureus2024
A Review of Semen Analysis: Updates From the WHO Sixth Edition Manual and Advances in Male Fertility Assessment.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metabolic Syndrome and Male Infertility: The Role of Obesity and Chronic Inflammation.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Antioxidant Capacity of Seminal Plasma and Its Association with Semen Quality and Dietary Antioxidant Intake.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Integrating Sperm Microscopy, Environmental Exposures, and Lifestyle Factors for Male Fertility Analysis: Protocol for the Nippon Semen and Environmental Exposure Database (N-SEED) Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Protective role of Actovegin against Cisplatin-evoked testicular damage: evidence from a rat model.Journal of molecular histology · 2026Article
- Preventive Strategies and Biomarkers in Male Reproductive Health from Multidisciplinary Perspective: Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Epidemiology, Etiopathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Male Infertility-Current Trends and Future Directions: A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Environmental determinants of male infertility: emerging threats and technological interventions.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- The effects of polysaccharides fromFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Sperm metabolomic signatures of asthenozoospermia and teratozoospermia in Chinese reproductive-age men.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Semen analysis is essentially used to check the fertility of a man, especially when couples are having difficulties conceiving. Studies concerning male fertility, testicular factors, and seminal characteristics have been under investigation for the last few decades. In 1980, the World Health Organization (WHO) started reaching out to scientists in order to set standards for high-quality semen and develop a semen manual. From this point to the present, six editions of this manual have been produced, delineating the characteristics of semen and reporting protocols for semen analysis. Sperm morphology is analyzed as per WHO norms to measure the biological capacity of a male for reproduction. Both national and international manuals have been developed, with the latest, the sixth edition, produced in July 2021. This review paper conveys the current WHO publication's updates and identifies the clinical recommendations for proper evaluations. The publication considers the characteristics of semen in order to discuss the content of the previous editions of the WHO. It is also utilized to assess the method applied to determine the DNA presence of sperm fragmentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.