ArticleCureus2024
Antifibrotics in the Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: Prospective Real-World Experience From an Interstitial Lung Disease Clinic in India.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Progressive fibrotic interstitial lung diseases in India: national challenges and implications for global health policies.Health research policy and systems · 2025Review
- Impact of Pharmacological Treatments on Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Diffuse Interstitial Lung Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Real-World Clinical Effectiveness and Safety of Antifibrotics in Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis Associated with Rheumatoid Arthritis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND &
objectivesInterstitial lung disease (ILD) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a serious complication with varied prevalence ranging from 4% to as high as 68%, with varied presentation. Immunosuppressants and antifibrotics are used in the management of RA ILD. The clinicodemographic profile and presentation in our country need to be further explored. We assessed the efficacy and safety profile of antifibrotic drugs in combination with immunosuppressants among RA ILD patients.
methodsA prospective observational study was conducted in the Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) Clinic in the Department of Pulmonary Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Raipur, India, between January 2022 to January 2023. RA patients with dyspnea and chronic cough were referred to us for evaluation of ILD. Patients underwent clinical examination, complete lung function study including spirometry, single breath diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO), six-minute walk test, and high-resolution computed tomography of the thorax. Quality of life was assessed using the King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease (KBILD) questionnaire.
resultsTwo hundred eighteen RA patients were evaluated and out of these, 43 (20.8%) had features of ILD on high-resolution computed tomogram (HRCT) thorax. Twenty-six (2.18%) met the inclusion criteria for starting antifibrotics. The mean ± SD. age of the patients was 52.96 ± 14.04 and the majority (77%) were females. Fourteen (53.38%) patients had usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP)/probable UIP pattern and 12 (46.22%) had nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) patterns on HRCT. Out of 26 patients, 24 (92.3%) were started on antifibrotics. Fourteen (53.8%) patients were on nintedanib and 10 (38.4%) were on pirfenidone. The mean ± SD forced vital capacity (FVC)% predictedwas 62.5 ± 20.04. The mean ± SD. The DLCO percentage predicted was 54.4 ± 22.8. Twenty-two (84.6%) patients did not experience any side effects. The mean ± SD. KBILD score was 59.9 ± 11.17 and was similar in both sexes.
conclusionIn our study, the prevalence of RA ILD was nearly 20.8% and more common in females. Twenty-four (2%) patients were included for antifibrotic treatment. There was an improvement in lung function at the end of six months, but the change was not significant. All patients tolerated antifibrotics well without any serious adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.