Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39081328›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain research2024

A Single Center Exploratory Survey of Patients and Nurses on post-Surgical Oral Opioid Delivery Through Patient-Controlled Analgesia.

Daniyal H Mirza, Lucy Zha, Claudia See, Isabella N Paoletti, Feng Dai, Mark Hocevar, Jinlei Li, Daniel Wiznia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Daniyal H Mirza *Yale College, New Haven, CT, 06520-8241, USA.
Lucy Zha *Yale College, New Haven, CT, 06520-8241, USA.
Claudia SeeYale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
Isabella N PaolettiYale College, New Haven, CT, 06520-8241, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-5916-0327
Feng DaiYale Center for Analytical Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
Mark HocevarWarren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, 02903, USA.
Jinlei LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4026-2569
Daniel WizniaDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Mechanical Engineering & Materials Science, School of Engineering & Applied Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The most common route of opioid delivery is nurse-administered pills. However, there are numerous challenges such as nursing burden, opioid diversion, medication delay, and patient dissatisfaction. In this study, we conducted two surveys, first to assess patients' and nurses' opinions on the current administration of opioids in pill form, followed by their attitudes towards an innovative concept of oral medication delivery based on a medical device currently undergoing research and development within the University, patient-controlled dispenser and deactivator (PCDD) that allows patients to self-administer liquid oral opioids on demand based on physician prescription. Methods: Questionnaires were developed, verified and deployed to assess nurse and post-surgical patient opinions on the current administration of opioids in pill form, as well as the proposed new concept of patient -controlled administration of oral liquid medication via an illustration of PCDD, from September 2022 through July 2023 at a major academic tertiary care center. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected from postoperative patients and nurses from surgical specialties including General Surgery, Surgical Oncology, Trauma Surgery, Orthopedics, and Neurosurgery. Results: Forty-three patients and 53 nurses were interviewed. Seventy percent of patients frequently called nurses for pain medication post-surgery 1-4 times daily, and 32% of patients were told each day by nurses that they could not receive medication because they were not due yet. Medication delay caused 24% of patients to worry about nursing availability for medication delivery. Likewise, nurses reported that half of patients receive delayed medication (22 minutes median delay time) and half of nursing time was spent administering pain medication. Nurses expressed moderate satisfaction with their current delivery of medication (median satisfaction score 6.5 out of 10). When being introduced to the concept of PCDD via a product illustration, 15% of patients said that they prefer liquid medication and 51% said they prefer PCDD or were interested in trying it. Conclusion: Nurse-administered pills are a common but suboptimal method for postoperative pain management. Based on patient and nurse feedback, patient controlled self-administered liquid oral opioid delivery is conceptually innovative, practically viable and potentially a preferred alternative for timely and less nurse-exhaustive pain management.

Indexed as

nursingopioidpain managementpatient-controlled analgesia pumpsurvey

Identifiers

PMID39081328
PMCPMC11288353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.