ReviewGut and liver2024
Cellular Plasticity in Gut and Liver Regeneration.
Review in Gut and liver, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cell phenotypic conversion and fate change during the host defense response, tissue injury and repair.Pharmacology & therapeutics · 2026Review
- SALL4 Is Required for YAP1-Dependent Malignant and Regenerative Hepatocyte-to-Cholangiocyte Reprogramming.Cancer research communications · 2025Article
- Review
- The value of fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) promoter methylation in the repair and regeneration during the course of chronic hepatitis B.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Article
- Insights into intestinal barrier disruption during long-term gutFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- Mustard Meal Extract as an Alternative to Zinc Oxide for Protecting the Intestinal Barrier AgainstInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- The molecular determinants of phenotypic plasticity in homeostasis and neoplasia.Cancer heterogeneity and plasticity · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The intestine and liver share a unique regenerative property that sets them apart from other mammalian visceral organs. The intestinal epithelium exhibits rapid renewal, making it one of the fastest renewing tissues in humans. Under physiological conditions, intestinal stem cells within each intestinal crypt continuously differentiate into the different types of intestinal epithelial cells to maintain intestinal homeostasis. However, when exposed to tissue damage or stressful conditions such as inflammation, intestinal epithelial cells in the gastrointestinal tract exhibit plasticity, allowing fully differentiated cells to regain their stem cell properties. Likewise, hepatic epithelial cells possess a remarkable regenerative capacity to restore lost liver mass through proliferation-mediated liver regeneration. When the proliferation-mediated regenerative capacity is impaired, hepatocytes and biliary epithelial cells (BECs) can undergo plasticity-mediated regeneration and replenish each other. The transition of mammalian liver progenitor cells to hepatocytes/BECs can be observed under tightly controlled experimental conditions such as severe hepatocyte injury accompanied by the loss of regenerative capacity. In this review, we will discuss the mechanism by which cellular plasticity contributes to the regeneration process and the potential therapeutic implications of understanding and harnessing cellular plasticity in the gut and liver.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.