Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39081055›Full record

ArticleHealth education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education2025

Primary Care Providers' Experiences With an Active Elective Genetic Testing Program.

Dylan M Platt, Carrie L Blout Zawatsky, Kurt D Christensen, Robert C Green, Catherine Hajek, Madison R Hickingbotham, Allison M Hutchinson, Jessica L LeBlanc, Emilie S Zoltick, Leila Jamal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Dylan M PlattSanford Health Imagenetics, Sioux Falls, SD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6343-3717
Carrie L Blout ZawatskyAriadne Labs, Boston, MA, USA.
Kurt D ChristensenHarvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4068-776X
Robert C GreenAriadne Labs, Boston, MA, USA.
Catherine HajekSanford Health Imagenetics, Sioux Falls, SD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7497-4540
Madison R HickingbothamHarvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Allison M HutchinsonAugustana University, Sioux Falls, SD, USA.
Jessica L LeBlancHarvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Emilie S ZoltickHarvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7965-9769
Leila JamalNational Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Funding

Clinical Cancer Genomics ProgramZIDBC011908 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI CALZONE, KATHLEEN · 2019 to 2025
$9.3M
Cost-effectiveness of Whole Genome Sequencing of Healthy AdultsK01HG009173 · NHGRI · HARVARD PILGRIM HEALTH CARE, INC. · PI CHRISTENSEN, KURT DEREK · 2016 to 2020
$626k
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999NHGRI NIH HHS K01 HG009173
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elective genetic testing (EGT) programs that provide pharmacogenomic information to guide medication management and screen for medically actionable disease predispositions are emerging in a number of health systems. Primary care providers (PCPs) are at the forefront of test initiation, patient education, and management of EGT results. However, little research has examined the experiences of PCPs in health systems offering clinical EGT. We conducted semi-structured interviews, a sub-study of the larger mixed-methods Imagenetics Initiative, with 16 PCPs at a health system in the Midwest with a clinical EGT program supported by provider education, automated clinical decision support, and enhanced access to genetic specialists. The purpose of these interviews was to understand perceptions about the benefits and barriers of implementing EGT in clinical practice. Thematic analysis indicated that EGT is conceptualized similar to traditional diagnostic services. PCPs were generally favorable toward EGT; however, targeted education did not dispel misconceptions about the goals, results, and limitations of EGT. Most PCPs endorsed the potential utility of EGT. Pharmacogenomic profiling was seen as having more immediate impact for patients than screening for monogenic disease risks. PCPs reported that they weighed discussions about EGT against time limitations and the need to prioritize patients' existing health concerns. Regardless of their education levels and familiarity with genetics, PCPs desired additional educational resources and greater access to genetic specialists. Our study provides unique insight into PCPs' experiences with clinical EGT in health systems that have adopted EGT and highlights the practical challenges and potential opportunities of EGT integration.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelGenetic TestingPhysicians, Primary CarePrimary Health CareAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Researchelective genetic testinggenetic educationhealth care provider educationpersonalized medicinepopulation screening

Identifiers

PMID39081055
PMCPMC12258620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.