ReviewMuscle & nerve2025
Utility of laryngeal electromyography for establishing prognosis and individualized treatment after laryngeal neuropathies.
Review in Muscle & nerve, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Placental-Derived Connective Tissue Matrix Mediates Murine Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Regeneration.The Laryngoscope · 2026Article
- The impact of synkinesis on voice restoration in idiopathic vocal fold paralysis patients with different disease courses.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Analysis of Factors Influencing Voice Outcome in Unilateral Vocal Fold Paresis and Paralysis.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2025Article
- Utility of laryngeal electromyography for establishing prognosis and individualized treatment after laryngeal neuropathies.Muscle & nerve · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Laryngeal electromyography (LEMG) is a technique used to characterize neuropathic injuries to the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) and superior laryngeal nerve (SLN). The RLN and SLN innervate the laryngeal muscles to produce vocal fold (VF) motion and elongation, respectively. VF motion deficiencies can affect voice, swallowing, and breathing, which can greatly affect a patient's quality of life. Neuropathy-related VF motion deficiencies most often result from surgical interventions to the skull base, neck, or chest likely due to the circuitous route of the RLN. LEMG is ideally conducted by an electromyographer and an otolaryngologist using a team-approach. LEMG is a powerful diagnostic tool to better characterize the extent of neuropathic injury and thus clarify the prognosis for VF motion recovery. This updated review discusses current techniques to improve the positive and negative predictive values of LEMG using laryngeal synkinesis and quantitative LEMG. Synkinesis can be diagnosed by comparing motor unit potential amplitude during vocalization and sniff maneuvers when recording within adductor muscles. Quantitative turns analysis can measure motor unit recruitment to avoid subjective descriptions of reduced depolarization during vocalization, and normal values are >400 turns/s. By integrating qualitative, quantitative, and synkinetic data, a robust prognosis can help clinicians determine if VF weakness will recover. Based on LEMG interpretation, patient-centered treatment can be developed to include watchful waiting, temporary VF augmentation, or definitive medialization procedures and laryngeal reinnervation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.