Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39080913›Full record

ArticleJournal of foot and ankle research2024

Measuring 24-h use of time in people with a diabetes-related foot ulcer: A feasibility study.

Andrew Murphy, Kristin Graham, Timothy Olds, Cathy Loughry, François Fraysse, Dot Dumuid, Ty Stanford, Lisa Matricciani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of foot and ankle research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andrew MurphyAllied Health and Human Performance (AHHP), University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3138-0485
Kristin GrahamAllied Health and Human Performance (AHHP), University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1864-1856
Timothy OldsAllied Health and Human Performance (AHHP), University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Cathy LoughryAllied Health and Human Performance (AHHP), University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
François FraysseAlliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity (ARENA), University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Dot DumuidAllied Health and Human Performance (AHHP), University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Ty StanfordAlliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity (ARENA), University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Lisa MatriccianiAlliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity (ARENA), University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4480-4188

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysical activity (PA), sleep and sedentary time are now recognised as mutually exclusive and exhaustive parts of the 24-h day-if PA decreases, time spent sleeping, being sedentary or both must increase so that all components equate to 24 h. Recent advances in time-use epidemiology suggest that we should not consider time-use domains (PA, sleep and sedentary time) in isolation from each other, but in terms of a composition-the mix of time-use domains across the 24-h day. While interrelated daily activities are known to be important in the management of diabetes mellitus, few studies have investigated the interrelated daily activities in people with an active diabetes-related foot ulcer (DFU) and their impact on important outcomes such as wound severity, blood glucose control and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This feasibility study aims to determine the acceptability and practicality of measuring 24-h use of time data in people with a DFU and its associations on important outcome measures for this population.

methodsParticipants wore a wrist-worn accelerometer for two weeks and completed demographic and HRQoL questionnaires. Outcomes were participant engagement, reported levels of study burden and value and compositional data analysis as a methodological approach for evaluating 24-h use of time data.

resultsTwenty-six participants reported low levels of study burden and rated the study value highly. The protocol appears feasible in terms of recruitment (81%) and retention rate (86%). On average, participants were relatively sedentary spending 747, 172 and 18 min in sedentary time, light physical activity and moderate-to-vigorous activity, respectively. Sleep appeared adequate with participants obtaining an average of 485 min, but quality of sleep was notably poor with average sleep efficiency of 75%. Compositional data analysis was able to quantify the integrated associations of 24-h use of time with HRQoL.

conclusionThe protocol provides an acceptable method to collect 24-h use of time data in people with a DFU. Efforts to consider and analyse PA as part of a 24-h activity composition may provide holistic and realistic understandings of PA in this clinical population.

Indexed as

Diabetic FootExerciseFeasibility StudiesQuality of LifeSedentary BehaviorSleepAccelerometryActivities of Daily LivingAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesTime Factorsdiabetesdiabetes mellitusdiabetes‐related foot ulcerphysical activitysedentary behaviour

Identifiers

PMID39080913
PMCPMC11633338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.