Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39080899›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2021

A Deep Learning Ensemble Method to Assist Cytopathologists in Pap Test Image Classification.

Débora N Diniz, Mariana T Rezende, Andrea G C Bianchi, Claudia M Carneiro, Eduardo J S Luz, Gladston J P Moreira, Daniela M Ushizima, Fátima N S de Medeiros, Marcone J F Souza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Débora N DinizDepartamento de Computação, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP), Ouro Preto 35400-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1951-8868
Mariana T RezendeDepartamento de Análises Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP), Ouro Preto 35400-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9514-9312
Andrea G C BianchiDepartamento de Computação, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP), Ouro Preto 35400-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7949-1188
Claudia M CarneiroDepartamento de Análises Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP), Ouro Preto 35400-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6002-857X
Eduardo J S LuzDepartamento de Computação, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP), Ouro Preto 35400-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5249-1559
Gladston J P MoreiraDepartamento de Computação, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP), Ouro Preto 35400-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7747-5926
Daniela M UshizimaComputational Research Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7363-9468
Fátima N S de MedeirosDepartamento de Engenharia de Teleinformática, Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC), Fortaleza 60455-970, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3075-8771
Marcone J F SouzaDepartamento de Computação, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP), Ouro Preto 35400-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7141-357X

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 06/2015 - 306396/2015-7Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 06/2019 305895/2019-2Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 303266/2019-8Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 401120/2013/9Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior Finance Code 001Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais PPM/CEX/FAPEMIG/6-76-17Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais PPSUS-FAPEMIG/APQ-03740-17Office of Science, of the U.S. Department of Energy DE-AC02-05CH11231Pró-Reitoria de Pesquisa e Inovação, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto 23109.000928/2020-33Pró-Reitoria de Pesquisa e Inovação, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto 23109.000929/2020-88
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, deep learning methods have outperformed previous state-of-the-art machine learning techniques for several problems, including image classification. Classifying cells in Pap smear images is very challenging, and it is still of paramount importance for cytopathologists. The Pap test is a cervical cancer prevention test that tracks preneoplastic changes in cervical epithelial cells. Carrying out this exam is important in that early detection. It is directly related to a greater chance of curing or reducing the number of deaths caused by the disease. The analysis of Pap smears is exhaustive and repetitive, as it is performed manually by cytopathologists. Therefore, a tool that assists cytopathologists is needed. This work considers 10 deep convolutional neural networks and proposes an ensemble of the three best architectures to classify cervical cancer upon cell nuclei and reduce the professionals' workload. The dataset used in the experiments is available in the Center for Recognition and Inspection of Cells (CRIC) Searchable Image Database. Considering the metrics of precision, recall, F1-score, accuracy, and sensitivity, the proposed ensemble improves previous methods shown in the literature for two- and three-class classification. We also introduce the six-class classification outcome.

Indexed as

cervical cancerdeep learningensemble of classifiersimages classificationPap smear

Identifiers

PMID39080899
PMCPMC8321382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.