ArticleJournal of imaging2021
Super Resolution of Magnetic Resonance Images.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-omics prediction of axillary treatment response and tumour microenvironment alterations in lymph node-positive luminal breast cancer.Cell death & disease · 2025Article
- Deep-learning-based reconstruction of T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate accelerated by compressed sensing provides improved image quality at half the acquisition time.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this work, novel denoising and super resolution (SR) approaches for magnetic resonance (MR) images are addressed, and are integrated in a unified framework, which do not require example low resolution (LR)/high resolution (HR)/cross-modality/noise-free images and prior information of noise-noise variance. The proposed method categorizes the patches as either smooth or textured and then denoises them by deploying different denoising strategies for efficient denoising. The denoising algorithm is integrated into the SR approach, which uses a gradient profile-based constraint in a sparse representation-based framework to improve the resolution of MR images with reduced smearing of image details. This constraint regularizes the estimation of HR images such that the estimated HR image has gradient profiles similar to the gradient profiles of the original HR image. For this, the gradient profile sharpness (GPS) values of an unknown HR image are estimated using an approximated piece-wise linear relation among GPS values of LR and upsampled LR images. The experiments are performed on three different publicly available datasets. The proposed SR approach outperforms the existing unsupervised SR approach addressed for real MR images that exploits low rank and total variation (LRTV) regularization, by an average peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR) of 0.73 dB and 0.38 dB for upsampling factors 2 and 3, respectively. For the super resolution of noisy real MR images (degraded with 2% noise), the proposed approach outperforms the LRTV approach by an average PSNR of 0.54 dB and 0.46 dB for upsampling factors 2 and 3, respectively. The qualitative analysis is shown for real MR images from healthy subjects and subjects with Alzheimer's disease and structural deformity, i.e., cavernoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.