Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39080780›Full record

ReviewPatient safety in surgery2024

Opioid exit plans for tapering postoperative pain control in noncancer patients: a systematic review.

Marcel Rainer, Sarah Maleika Ommerli, Andrea Michelle Burden, Leo Betschart, Dominik Stämpfli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Patient safety in surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marcel Rainer *Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, ETH Zurich, Vladimir-Prelog Weg 1-5/10, 8093, Zurich, Switzerland.
Sarah Maleika Ommerli *Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, ETH Zurich, Vladimir-Prelog Weg 1-5/10, 8093, Zurich, Switzerland.
Andrea Michelle BurdenInstitute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, ETH Zurich, Vladimir-Prelog Weg 1-5/10, 8093, Zurich, Switzerland.
Leo BetschartChemistry | Biology | Pharmacy Information Center, ETH Zurich, Vladimir-Prelog Weg 10, 8093, Zurich, Switzerland.
Dominik StämpfliInstitute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, ETH Zurich, Vladimir-Prelog Weg 1-5/10, 8093, Zurich, Switzerland. dominik.staempfli@pharma.ethz.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA growing number of countries have reported sharp increases in the use and harm of opioid analgesics. High rates of new opioid initiation are observed in postoperative patients. In response, various tertiary care institutions have developed opioid exit plans (OEPs) to curb potential opioid-related harm.

methodsPubMed and Embase were systematically searched to identify, summarize, and compare the interventional elements of OEPs for postoperative patient populations published from January 1, 2000, to June 4, 2024. Two researchers independently screened the articles for eligibility following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, extracted the data, and assessed the study quality and risk of bias. Data synthesis was performed for study characteristics, intervention details, efficacy, and development.

resultsA total of 2,585 articles were screened, eight of which met the eligibility criteria. All studies were conducted in North America and focused on orthopedic surgery patients following total hip or knee arthroplasty (n = 5) or neurosurgery (n = 3). Most studies (n = 7) included a pre-post (n = 4) or randomized clinical design (n = 3). Three studies were of good quality, and none had a low risk of bias. The interventions varied and ranged from educational sessions (n = 1) to individualized tapering protocols (n = 4) or a combination of the two (n = 2). Key elements were instructions on how to anticipate patients' postoperative need for opioid analgesics and tapering strategies based on 24-h predischarge opioid consumption. Six studies included efficacy as an endpoint in their analysis, of which four assessed statistical significance, with all four identifying that the OEPs were successful in reducing postoperative opioid use.

conclusionDespite differences in design and implementation, the identified OEPs suggest that they are efficacious in reducing outpatient opioid consumption. They provide a robust estimate of postoperative analgesic requirements and a rationale for tapering duration and rate. However, more rigorous studies are needed to evaluate their real-world effectiveness.

Indexed as

DeprescribingDrug safetyHospital dischargeNoncancer painOpioid analgesicsOpioid taperingPostoperative patient managementPreventive medicineSystematic reviewTransitional care

Identifiers

PMID39080780
PMCPMC11290124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.