Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39080688›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2024

Escape room design in training crew resource management in acute care: a scoping review.

Gerald J Jaspers, Simone Borsci, Johannes G van der Hoeven, Wietske Kuijer-Siebelink, Joris Lemson

Registry-linked trialAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06907030 (Evaluation of Operational Wear and Tear Related to the Caledonian Crisis on Military Personnel), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06907030 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Operational Wear and Tear Related to the Caledonian Crisis on Military Personnel

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorDirection Centrale du Service de Santé des ArméesRan2025 to 2026Enrolled200ConditionsChronic Stress DisorderArmsNo intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The escape room: will we be able to build a team?Internal and emergency medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gerald J JaspersDepartment of Intensive Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Groote Plein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, 6525GA, The Netherlands. Gerald.jaspers@radboudumc.nl.
Simone BorsciHuman Factors and Cognitive Ergonomics, Research Coordinator Human Factors-CODE team DSI institute & Faculty Behavioral, Management and Social Sciences (BMS), Data and Education (CODE) Group, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, Cognition, Enschede, NB, 7522, The Netherlands.
Johannes G van der HoevenDepartment of Intensive Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Groote Plein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, 6525GA, The Netherlands.
Wietske Kuijer-SiebelinkResearch on Learning and Education, Radboudumc Health Academy, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Groote Plein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, 6525GA, The Netherlands.
Joris LemsonDepartment of Intensive Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Groote Plein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, 6525GA, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective teamwork is crucial to providing safe and high-quality patient care, especially in acute care. Crew Resource Management (CRM) principles are often used for training teamwork in these situations, with escape rooms forming a promising new tool. However, little is known about escape room design characteristics and their effect on learning outcomes. We investigated the current status of design characteristics and their effect on learning outcomes for escape room-based CRM/teamwork training for acute care professionals. We also aimed to identify gaps in literature to guide further research.

methodsMultiple databases were searched for studies describing the design and effect of escape rooms aimed training CRM/teamwork in acute care professionals and in situations that share characteristics. A standardized process was used for screening and selection. An evidence table that included study characteristics, design characteristics and effect of the escape room on learning outcomes was used to extract data. Learning outcomes were graded according to IPE expanded typology of Kirkpatrick's levels of learning outcome and Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI) scores were calculated to assess methodology.

resultsFourteen studies were included. Common design characteristics were a team size of 4-6 participants, a 40-minute time limit, linear puzzle organization and use of briefing and structured debriefing. Information on alignment was only available in five studies and reporting on several other educational and escape room design characteristics was low. Twelve studies evaluated the effect of the escape room on teamwork: nine evaluated reaction (Kirkpatrick level 1; n = 9), two evaluated learning (Kirkpatrick level 2) and one evaluated both. Overall effect on teamwork was overtly positive, with little difference between studies. Together with a mean MERSQI score of 7.0, this precluded connecting specific design characteristics to the effect on learning outcomes.

conclusionsThere is insufficient evidence if and how design characteristics affect learning outcomes in escape rooms aimed at training CRM/teamwork in acute care professionals. Alignment of teamwork with learning goals is insufficiently reported. More complete reporting of escape rooms aimed at training CRM/teamwork in acute care professionals is needed, with a research focus on maximizing learning potential through design.

Indexed as

Patient Care TeamCrew Resource Management, HealthcareCritical CareHumansCrisis resource managementEscape gameNon-technical skillsPuzzle roomTeamwork

Identifiers

PMID39080688
PMCPMC11290095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.