Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39080598›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Use of an electronic wellness instrument in the integrated health and social care of older adults: a group concept mapping study.

Melissa Northwood, Margaret Saari, George Heckman, Ted Alexander, Bill Eastway, Patricia Gerantonis, Deanne Gillies, Susie Gregg, Jane McKinnon Wilson, Adam Morrison and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Melissa NorthwoodSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Health Sciences Centre 3N25a, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada. northwm@mcmaster.ca.
Margaret SaariSE Research Centre, SE Health, Markham, ON, Canada.
George HeckmanSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Ted AlexandereHealth Centre of Excellence, Kitchener, ON, Canada.
Bill EastwayPatient Partner, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Patricia GerantonisSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Health Sciences Centre 3N25a, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
Deanne GilliesK-W Seniors Day Program, Kitchener, ON, Canada.
Susie GreggCanadian Mental Health Association Waterloo Wellington, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Jane McKinnon WilsonCanadian Mental Health Association Waterloo Wellington, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Adam MorrisonProvincial Geriatrics Leadership Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Heebah SultanOntario Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Luke TurcotteHealth Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth system fragmentation directly contributes to poor health and social outcomes for older adults with multiple chronic conditions and their care partners. Older adults often require support from primary care, multiple specialists, home care, community support services, and other health-care sectors and communication between these providers is unstructured and not standardized. Integrated and interprofessional team-based models of care are a recommended strategy to improve health service delivery to older adults with complex needs. Standardized assessment instruments deployed on digital platforms are considered a necessary component of integrated care. The aim of this study was to develop strategies to leverage an electronic wellness instrument, interRAI Check Up Self Report, to support integrated health and social care for older adults and their care partners in a community in Southern Ontario, Canada.

methodsGroup concept mapping, a participatory mixed-methods approach, was conducted. Participants included older adults, care partners, and representatives from: home care, community support services, specialized geriatric services, primary care, and health informatics. In a series of virtual meetings, participants generated ideas to implement the interRAI Check Up and rated the relative importance of these ideas. Hierarchical cluster analysis was used to map the ideas into clusters of similar statements. Participants reviewed the map to co-create an action plan.

resultsForty-one participants contributed to a cluster map of ten action areas (e.g., engagement of older adults and care partners, instrument's ease of use, accessibility of the assessment process, person-centred process, training and education for providers, provider coordination, health information integration, health system decision support and quality improvement, and privacy and confidentiality). The health system decision support cluster was rated as the lowest relative importance and the health information integration was cluster rated as the highest relative importance.

conclusionsMany person-, provider-, and system-level factors need to be considered when implementing and using an electronic wellness instrument across health- and social-care providers. These factors are highly relevant to the integration of other standardized instruments into interprofessional team care to ensure a compassionate care approach as technology is introduced.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health Care, IntegratedDigital HealthAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleOntarioAgedCare partnersConfidentialityinterRAIMedical informaticsMultiple chronic conditionsPrivacySelf-report

Identifiers

PMID39080598
PMCPMC11288113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.