ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2024
Prevalence and pattern of congenital clubfoot among less than 5-year-old children in Ethiopia; cross-sectional based study.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Treatment outcome of the Ponseti method for clubfoot in Africa : a systematic review and meta-analysis.Bone & joint open · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClubfoot is one of the most common congenital malformations, but it is also one of the most neglected public health problems among less than five-year-old children, mainly in middle- and low-income countries. Approximately 80% of clubfoot cases are found in low- and middle-income countries. In this study setting, no epidemiological studies have been conducted to assess clubfoot deformity. Due to this gap, the study aimed to assess prevalence, and pattern of congenital club foot among less than 5-year-old children. MATERIALS AND
methodsAn institutional-based cross-sectional study was carried out at Black Lion Specialized Hospital at the pediatric orthopedic clinic. The sample size was 261 to determine the prevalence and pattern of congenital clubfoot. Terms like frequency, percentage, and mean were used for data presentation.
resultA total of 36,303 pediatric patients visited Black Lion Specialized Hospital during the study period, and clubfoot prevalence was 7.2 per 1000. The largest subclassification of congenital clubfoot was idiopathic clubfoot, which accounted for 6.2 per 1000, whereas syndromic clubfoot was 0.3 per 1000, and neuropathic clubfoot was shared at 0.36 per 1000. Most of the cases in this study were bilateral clubfoot, with males having more dominance.
conclusionIn the area under investigation, a significant prevalence of congenital clubfoot was observed, especially among male children. The majority of cases were bilateral, with idiopathic clubfoot being the dominant form.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.