ArticleBMC cancer2024
Prognostic significance of the novel immunonutritional marker of cholesterol-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with non-metastatic breast cancer.
Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cholesterol-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Predictor of 1-Year Unplanned Readmission in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Retrospective Cohort Study.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Cholesterol-to-lymphocyte ratio (CLR)-based nomogram as a prognostic tool in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a large-scale long-term retrospective study.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough there is a strong correlation between the novel cholesterol-to-lymphocyte ratio (CLR) and tumor survival, its prognostic significance in breast cancer (BC) is unknown. After analyzing the relationship between CLR and the overall survival (OS) of patients with BC, we created a predictive model.
methodsFollowing retrospective enrollment, 1316 patients with BC were randomized into two cohorts: validation (n = 392) and training (n = 924). Distinct factors within the training dataset were identified for OS by univariate and multivariate Cox analyses; two-tailed P-value < 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. On this premise, we developed novel signals for survival prediction and utilized the calibration curve, receiver operating characteristic curves, and concordance index (C-index) to validate their efficacy across both datasets.
resultsPatients with BC were categorized into two categories with differing prognoses based on the CLR score [hazard ratio = 0.492; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.286-0.846, P = 0.009]. A prediction nomogram was created based on multivariate analysis, which showed that N stage, postoperative pathological categorization, and CLR score were all independently correlated with OS. In the training [C-index = 0.831 (95% CI: 0.788-0.874)] and validation [C-index = 0.775 (95% CI: 0.694-0.856)] cohorts, the nomogram demonstrated favorable performance in predicting OS. In both the training and validation cohorts, it outperformed the traditional staging system [C-index = 0.702 (95% CI: 0.623-0.782)] and [C-index = 0.709 (95% CI: 0.570-0.847)]. The accurate prediction by the signature was further demonstrated by the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves.
conclusionsThe novel immunonutritional marker CLR could function as a simplified, cost-effective, easily accessible, non-invasive, and readily promotive prognostic indicator for patients with early-stage BC and demonstrates superior predictive power than the traditional staging system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.