Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39080565›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2024

Genetic diversity of United States Rambouillet, Katahdin and Dorper sheep.

Gabrielle M Becker, Jacob W Thorne, Joan M Burke, Ronald M Lewis, David R Notter, James L M Morgan, Christopher S Schauer, Whit C Stewart, R R Redden, Brenda M Murdoch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The Effects of SNPs in theVeterinary medicine international · 2026
    Article
  4. Genomic Diversity of U.S. Katahdin Hair Sheep.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gabrielle M BeckerDepartment of Animal, Veterinary and Food Science, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA.
Jacob W ThorneDepartment of Animal, Veterinary and Food Science, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA.
Joan M BurkeUSDA, ARS, Dale Bumpers Small Farms Research Center, Booneville, AR, USA.
Ronald M LewisDepartment of Animal Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA.
David R NotterSchool of Animal Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
James L M MorganRound Mountain Consulting, Fayetteville, AR, USA.
Christopher S SchauerHettinger Research Extension Center, North Dakota State University, Hettinger, ND, USA.
Whit C StewartDepartment of Animal Science, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, USA.
R R ReddenTexas A&M AgriLife Extension, Texas A&M University, San Angelo, TX, USA.
Brenda M MurdochDepartment of Animal, Veterinary and Food Science, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA. bmurdoch@uidaho.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8675-3473

Funding

Idaho State Department of Agriculture 004727National Institute of Food and Agriculture 1025808National Institute of Food and Agriculture IDA1566Philippine Council for Agriculture, Aquatic and Natural Resources Research and Development 2016-51300-25723
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundManaging genetic diversity is critically important for maintaining species fitness. Excessive homozygosity caused by the loss of genetic diversity can have detrimental effects on the reproduction and production performance of a breed. Analysis of genetic diversity can facilitate the identification of signatures of selection which may contribute to the specific characteristics regarding the health, production and physical appearance of a breed or population. In this study, breeds with well-characterized traits such as fine wool production (Rambouillet, N = 745), parasite resistance (Katahdin, N = 581) and environmental hardiness (Dorper, N = 265) were evaluated for inbreeding, effective population size (N

resultsKatahdin sheep had the largest current N

conclusionsIn this paper, we describe signatures of selection within diverse and economically important U.S. sheep breeds. The genes contained within these signatures are proposed for further study to understand their relevance to biological traits and improve understanding of breed diversity.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideSelection, GeneticAnimalsBreedingGenetic VariationHomozygoteInbreedingSheepSheep, DomesticUnited States

Identifiers

PMID39080565
PMCPMC11290166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.