Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39080518›Full record

ReviewThe journal of headache and pain2024

Unraveling the interplay of neuroinflammatory signaling between parenchymal and meningeal cells in migraine headache.

Turgay Dalkara, Zeynep Kaya, Şefik Evren Erdener

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of headache and pain, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Turgay DalkaraDepartments of Neuroscience and, Molecular Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Science, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey. t.dalkara@bilkent.edu.tr.
Zeynep KayaDepartment of Neurology, Başkent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Şefik Evren ErdenerInstitute of Neurological Sciences and Psychiatry, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.

Funding

Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu 118S435
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe initiation of migraine headaches and the involvement of neuroinflammatory signaling between parenchymal and meningeal cells remain unclear. Experimental evidence suggests that a cascade of inflammatory signaling originating from neurons may extend to the meninges, thereby inducing neurogenic inflammation and headache. This review explores the role of parenchymal inflammatory signaling in migraine headaches, drawing upon recent advancements. BODY: Studies in rodents have demonstrated that sterile meningeal inflammation can stimulate and sensitize meningeal nociceptors, culminating in headaches. The efficacy of relatively blood-brain barrier-impermeable anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide antibodies and triptans in treating migraine attacks, both with and without aura, supports the concept of migraine pain originating in meninges. Additionally, PET studies utilizing inflammation markers have revealed meningeal inflammatory activity in patients experiencing migraine with aura, particularly over the occipital cortex generating visual auras. The parenchymal neuroinflammatory signaling involving neurons, astrocytes, and microglia, which eventually extends to the meninges, can link non-homeostatic perturbations in the insensate brain to pain-sensitive meninges. Recent experimental research has brought deeper insight into parenchymal signaling mechanisms: Neuronal pannexin-1 channels act as stress sensors, initiating the inflammatory signaling by inflammasome formation and high-mobility group box-1 release in response to transient perturbations such as cortical spreading depolarization (CSD) or synaptic metabolic insufficiency caused by transcriptional changes induced by migraine triggers like sleep deprivation and stress. After a single CSD, astrocytes respond by upregulating the transcription of proinflammatory enzymes and mediators, while microglia are involved in restoring neuronal structural integrity; however, repeated CSDs may prompt microglia to adopt a pro-inflammatory state. Transcriptional changes from pro- to anti-inflammatory within 24 h may serve to dampen the inflammatory signaling. The extensive coverage of brain surface and perivascular areas by astrocyte endfeet suggests their role as an interface for transporting inflammatory mediators to the cerebrospinal fluid to contribute to meningeal nociception.

conclusionWe propose that neuronal stress induced by CSD or synaptic activity-energy mismatch may initiate a parenchymal inflammatory signaling cascade, transmitted to the meninges, thereby triggering lasting headaches characteristic of migraine, with or without aura. This neuroinflammatory interplay between parenchymal and meningeal cells points to the potential for novel targets for migraine treatment and prophylaxis.

Indexed as

MeningesMigraine DisordersNeuroinflammatory DiseasesSignal TransductionAnimalsHumansNeuronsDural neurogenic inflammationInflammasomeMigraineNeuroinflammationPannexinSpreading depolarization

Identifiers

PMID39080518
PMCPMC11290240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.