Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39080478›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Short-term outcomes of distal gastrectomy versus total gastrectomy for gastric cancer under enhanced recovery after surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Zhenmeng Lin, Mingfang Yan, Zhaoyan Lin, Yiping Xu, Huizhe Zheng, Yunzhen Peng, Yangming Li, Chunkang Yang

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zhenmeng Lin *Department of Anesthesiology Surgery, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University & Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Mingfang Yan *Department of Anesthesiology Surgery, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University & Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Zhaoyan Lin *College of Animal Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Yiping XuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University & Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Huizhe ZhengDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University & Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Yunzhen PengDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University & Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Yangming LiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University & Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China. lym@fjzlhospital.com.
Chunkang YangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University & Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China. chuck330@163.com.

Funding

Fujian Cancer Hospital Project 2024YN01Fujian Provincial Health Technology Project 2022TG016This study was supported by the Startup Fund for scientific research, Fujian Medical University 2020QH1226This study was supported by the Startup Fund for scientific research, Fujian Medical University 2022QH1158
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been used safely and effectively in patients with gastric cancer. Our aim was to evaluate the short-term outcomes of total gastrectomy (TG) versus distal gastrectomy (DG) for gastric cancer under ERAS. A prospectively collected database of 1349 patients with gastric cancer who underwent TG or DG between January 2016 and September 2022 was retrospectively analyzed. Propensity score matching analysis was used at a ratio of 1:1 to reduce confounding effects, and perioperative clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. The primary outcome was overall postoperative complications (POCs). Secondary outcomes comprised time to bowel function recovery, postoperative hospital stay, mortality, and 30-day readmission rate. Of 1349 identified patients, 296 (21.9%) experienced overall POCs. Before matching, multivariable analysis revealed that age, body mass index, diabetes, operation time, and extent of gastrectomy were independent risk factors for overall POCs. After matching, each group comprised 495 patients, and no significant differences were observed between the groups for all parameters except tumor location. Compared with TG, DG was associated with significantly earlier days to first flatus and to eating a soft diet, and shorter postoperative hospital stay (P < 0.05). The incidence of overall- and severe POCs (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ IIIa) in the TG group was significantly higher vs. the DG group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the number of days to eating a liquid diet, or mortality and 30-day readmission rates between the groups (P > 0.05). In the subgroup analysis for middle-third gastric cancer, the TG group experienced higher rates of overall- and severe POCs, with a longer postoperative hospital stay. Compared with DG, patients who underwent TG had higher POC rates, slower recovery of bowel function, and longer duration of hospitalization under ERAS. Therefore, caution is needed when initiating early feeding for patients who undergo TG.

Indexed as

Enhanced Recovery After SurgeryGastrectomyLength of StayPostoperative ComplicationsPropensity ScoreStomach NeoplasmsAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient ReadmissionRecovery of FunctionRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID39080478
PMCPMC11289314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.