ArticlePediatric research2025
Automated detection of abnormal general movements from pressure and positional information in hospitalized infants.
Article in Pediatric research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrechtl's general movements assessment (GMA) allows visual recognition of movement patterns that, when abnormal (cramped synchronized, or CS), have very high sensitivity in predicting later neuromotor disorders; however, training requirements and subjective perceptions from some clinicians may hinder universal adoption of the GMA in the newborn period.
methodsTo address this, we used a three-phased approach to design a preliminary and clinically-oriented approach to automated CS GMA detection. 335 hospitalized infants were dually recorded on video and a pressure-sensor mat that collected time, spatial, and pressure data. Video recordings were scored by advanced GMA readers. We then conducted a series of unsupervised machine learning and supervised classification modeling with features extracted from clinician- and mat-driven datasets. Finally, the resulting algorithm was converted to a software interface.
resultsA classification model combining normalization, clustering, and decision tree modeling resulted in the highest sensitivity for CS movements (100%). Results were delivered via the software interface within 20 min of data recording.
conclusionThe combination of clinical research, machine learning, and repurposing of existing sensor mat technology produced a feasible preliminary approach to automatically detect abnormal GMA in infants while still in the NICU. Further refinements of software and algorithms are needed. IMPACT STATEMENT: Machine learning can differentiate cramped synchronized general movement patterns in the neonatal intensive care unit with good sensitivity and specificity. Increasing access to the GMA through automated detection methods may allow for earlier identification of a greater number of children at high risk for movement delay. Large studies leveraging new artificial intelligence approaches could increase the impact of such detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39080462What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.