ArticleScientific reports2024
AI-based rock strength assessment from tunnel face images using hybrid neural networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Classification of the Surrounding Rock Based on Image Processing Analysis and Transfer Learning.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Research on lightweight tunnel cable fire recognition algorithm based on multi-scale features.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Rock physics-based approach to assess the effectiveness of cement-based backfill materials in coal mining.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In geological engineering and related fields, accurately and quickly identifying lithology and assessing rock strength are crucial for ensuring structural safety and optimizing design. Traditional rock strength assessment methods mainly rely on field sampling and laboratory tests, such as uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) tests and velocity tests. Although these methods provide relatively accurate rock strength data, they are complex, time-consuming, and unable to reflect real-time changes in field conditions. Therefore, this study proposes a new method based on artificial intelligence and neural networks to improve the efficiency and accuracy of rock strength assessments. This research utilizes a Transformer + UNet hybrid model for lithology identification and an optimized ResNet-18 model for determining rock weathering degrees, thereby correcting the strength of the tunnel face surrounding rock. Experimental results show that the Transformer + UNet hybrid model achieves an accuracy of 95.57% in lithology identification tasks, while the optimized ResNet model achieves an accuracy of 96.13% in rock weathering degree determination. Additionally, the average relative error in tunnel face strength detection results is only 9.33%, validating the feasibility and effectiveness of this method in practical engineering applications. The multi-model neural network system developed in this study significantly enhances prediction accuracy and efficiency, providing robust scientific decision support for tunnel construction, thereby improving construction safety and economy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.