Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39080434›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Distinct alterations in probabilistic reversal learning across at-risk mental state, first episode psychosis and persistent schizophrenia.

J D Griffin, K M J Diederen, J Haarsma, I C Jarratt Barnham, B R H Cook, E Fernandez-Egea, S Williamson, E D van Sprang, R Gaillard, F Vinckier and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

J D GriffinDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK. Juliet.griffin@psych.ox.ac.uk.
K M J DiederenDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK.
J HaarsmaWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, Queen Square, UCL, London, UK.
I C Jarratt BarnhamDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
B R H CookDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
E Fernandez-EgeaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
S WilliamsonCoventry and Warwickshire NHS Partnership Trust, Warwick, UK.
E D van SprangAmsterdam University Medical Centres (UMC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
R GaillardParis Descartes University, Paris, France.
F VinckierService Hospitalo-Universitaire, GHU Paris Psychiatrie & Neurosciences, F-75014, Paris, France.
I M GoodyerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9183-0373
NSPN Consortium
G K MurrayDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8296-1742
P C FletcherDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK. pcf22@cam.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/W029987/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We used a probabilistic reversal learning task to examine prediction error-driven belief updating in three clinical groups with psychosis or psychosis-like symptoms. Study 1 compared people with at-risk mental state and first episode psychosis (FEP) to matched controls. Study 2 compared people diagnosed with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) to matched controls. The design replicated our previous work showing ketamine-related perturbations in how meta-level confidence maintained behavioural policy. We applied the same computational modelling analysis here, in order to compare the pharmacological model to three groups at different stages of psychosis. Accuracy was reduced in FEP, reflecting increased tendencies to shift strategy following probabilistic errors. The TRS group also showed a greater tendency to shift choice strategies though accuracy levels were not significantly reduced. Applying the previously-used computational modelling approach, we observed that only the TRS group showed altered confidence-based modulation of responding, previously observed under ketamine administration. Overall, our behavioural findings demonstrated resemblance between clinical groups (FEP and TRS) and ketamine in terms of a reduction in stabilisation of responding in a noisy environment. The computational analysis suggested that TRS, but not FEP, replicates ketamine effects but we consider the computational findings preliminary given limitations in performance of the model.

Indexed as

KetaminePsychotic DisordersReversal LearningSchizophreniaAdolescentAdultCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSchizophrenic PsychologyYoung AdultKetamine

Identifiers

PMID39080434
PMCPMC11289106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.