Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39080416›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) strategically manipulate their environment to deny conspecifics access to food.

Stephan P Kaufhold, Alejandro Sánchez-Amaro, Jingzhi Tan, Sofia Fernandez-Navarro, Rebeca Atencia, Federico Rossano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stephan P KaufholdDepartment of Cognitive Science, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. spkaufho@ucsd.edu.
Alejandro Sánchez-AmaroDepartment of Cognitive Science, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Jingzhi TanDepartment of Cognitive Science, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Sofia Fernandez-NavarroJane Goodall Institute Republic of Congo, Pointe-Noire, Congo.
Rebeca AtenciaJane Goodall Institute Republic of Congo, Pointe-Noire, Congo.
Federico RossanoDepartment of Cognitive Science, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Funding

Academic Senate Grant UCSD RG096635
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans modify their environment to grant or prevent others' access to valuable resources, for example by using locks. We tested whether sanctuary-living chimpanzees (N = 10) would flexibly modify their environment to either allow or deny a dominant conspecific access to a shared food source by giving them the option to change a food reward's pathway prior to releasing it. The food could end up in one of two locations: one was accessible to both the subject and a dominant conspecific, the other one was only accessible to the subject. We further manipulated the extent of inhibitory control needed for modifying the pathway by varying the subjects' starting position. Our subjects reoriented the pathway competitively to monopolize food but changed the pathway less often in trials with high inhibitory demands. We further show how inhibitory task demands in a social context influence chimpanzees' future planning. Our results show that chimpanzees will strategically manipulate their environment to maximize their own and deny a dominant conspecific access to food.

Indexed as

FoodPan troglodytesAnimalsBehavior, AnimalFeeding BehaviorFemaleMaleRewardSocial Behavior

Identifiers

PMID39080416
PMCPMC11289288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.